I am director in company which owns property I live in. It is usual practice to implement share in freehold. We have 3 directors and a secretary. I had few objections on last AGM but the secretary failed to mention them in the minutes. I asked to change the text to reflect these objections (once I received it) and the secretary told me is that one director already signed it and they now cant be reversed.
I thought that all who was present on the meeting must agree minutes as if something is missing (accidentally or otherwise) there is no way you can later argue you said that and that. And in property-related issues it is very important to be able to demonstrate that you never agreed with certain decisions made on AGM.
What is the legal base for accepting a company AGM minutes?
I thought that all who was present on the meeting must agree minutes as if something is missing (accidentally or otherwise) there is no way you can later argue you said that and that. And in property-related issues it is very important to be able to demonstrate that you never agreed with certain decisions made on AGM.
What is the legal base for accepting a company AGM minutes?
