I've had an enforced break of 2 to 3 weeks twice in a current contract, where the client has written at short notice to say that no work will be offered and paid for during this period. Does anyone have any views on how this sits with regards to the IR35 MOO pointer?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Mutuality Of Obligation(MOO)
Collapse
X
-
-
Mr_Z
Interesting one.
I think its a good thing for a non-MOO pointer but I would be careful as as far as IR35 is concerned I would take a wider view of personal service and Control before making an IR35 decision based on this alone. Contractual terms need to be consistent with the practice ( as well as vice versa )
Phil -
Very good for IR35.
It clearly demonstrates that the client is not obliged to provide you with work.Still InvoicingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment