BN66 - the road to Judicial Review

[smalldog]

do u think this could possibly get him kicked out of office? How sweet would that be....

PS sorry if that sounds mercenary but my marriage has broken down due to all of this and Ive been living on the ragged edge since last May so quite frankly I dont give a F*** if anything bad happens to that weasel

[DonkeyRhubarb]

What do you mean by admissible in a court of law? Does this mean that it can be used in the JR? (If it does not get dropped before then.....)
Fog

I can't see any reason why it can't be used in the Judicial Review. The JCHR's report and letter to Timms even acknowledges that they are aware that a JR has been granted, and they clearly don't care if it prejudices HMRC's case.

This is what is going to make HMRC extremely angry. Their position is being undermined in public before they have even stepped into court, and there is absolutely nothing whatsoever they can do about it. This so unfair.

Perhaps they may try and claim that they can't get a fair trial now.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Message To Hmrc

We know some of you follow our forum.

Do yourselves a favour guys, and give it up now.

It is only a matter of time before the Press pick up on this. Save yourself from further embarrassment.

You can claim a small victory. People's lives have been damaged, some irrepairably, and it has scared the majority of contractors away from these sorts of schemes.

There is nothing to be gained from continuing with this charade.

Get your masters to read the report below and the letter to Timms.

|
|
|
V

[KiwiGuy]

Message to HMRC - Part 2

call me childish

[OnYourBikeGB]

Donkey King!

I've been settling down for the long haul!

This is amazing news! DR, your are a stallion amongst mules! Thank you.

[SantaClaus]

call me childish

Hey KiwiGuy, when the chips are down for HMRC, you gotta kick sand in their face

[NO TO RETRO]

We know some of you follow our forum.

Do yourselves a favour guys, and give it up now.

It is only a matter of time before the Press pick up on this. Save yourself from further embarrassment.

You can claim a small victory. People's lives have been damaged, some irrepairably, and it has scared the majority of contractors away from these sorts of schemes.

There is nothing to be gained from continuing with this charade.

Get your masters to read the report below and the letter to Timms.

|
|
|
V

I reckon DR is HMRC!!!!
To steal someone's ode to you before on this forum - 'You are quite simply THE MAN'

[stuffed]

Great work DR.

These guys at the Human Rights Joint Committee seem to be really on top of understanding what the government are trying to do, and the position that has resulted in relation to this legislation.
Glad to see these guys are a lot more intelligent than most MP's out there that allowed this legislation to get through in the first place.

Brought a tear to my eye the responses people have submitted, and am thankful for this forum and the people who have made contributions above the call of duty - I salute you in our battle together.

PS: Is it worth highlighting this latest information to some of the MP's - Gauke etc???

Or do we sit back and wait and see what Timms comes back with??

[DonkeyRhubarb]

PS: Is it worth highlighting this latest information to some of the MP's - Gauke etc???

You must be psychic.

A letter (from a constituent) went off to Gauke this lunch time. We have asked him to make his views known to the Committee.

The following bodies, that criticised the legislation when it was proposed, have also been notified:
Chartered Institute of Taxation
ICAEW
Law Society

[KiwiGuy]

You must be psychic.

A letter (from a constituent) went off to Gauke this lunch time. We have asked him to make his views known to the Committee.

The following bodies, that criticised the legislation when it was proposed, have also been notified:
Chartered Institute of Taxation
ICAEW
Law Society

If you end up doing one of your well writted letters ill send it to Ed Davey