income shifting - on ice

[TheFaQQer]

Come on Just1morethan you can't take that lying down. Are you a man or a mouse? I am waiting to be crushed like a cock-a-roach.

Just1morethen

HTH

[THEPUMA]

I've got better things to do than get involved in a slanging match with someone who is clearly as arrogant as you are.

I notice your busy schedule allowed you to put the boot into Hiram's accountant earlier in the week.

[ratewhore]

There is more to this query than meets the eye.

In the Arctic Systems case, the exemption which one the case for the Joneses in the House of Lords is only available to married couples and civil partners. This is presumably why your accountant thinks you are unable to pay dividends to your partner.

However, it is unlikely that a case would have been taken against the Joneses had they been unmarried.

This is because the settlements legislation can not normally be applied to unmarried partners where dividends are paid into the sole account of the non-fee generating partner. Whereas, payments to a spouse are automatically deemed to be of benefit to the other spouse.

So in summary, your accountant is half right but has reached the wrong conclusion.

Just1morethan, on the other hand, is a buffoon.

PUMA

won

ffs!!

[TheFaQQer]

won

ffs!!

FFS