does that not apply to all the SA already submitted and not future SA
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
services company question on tax return
Collapse
X
-
-
Damned if you do, damned if you don't ...
Originally posted by AZZIK View Postdoes that not apply to all the SA already submitted and not future SA
I'd rather take that chance this year than fill in the box and flag myself up for who knows what. All in the vain hope that the legality of the question itself might be challenged before next year's return.Comment
-
But surely leaving it blank when you 'should' be completing it is a greater offence?
For all we know they could be looking into people who leave the box blank!Comment
-
Comment
-
Surely every 1 man Ltd would have to tick this box.
My plumber runs through his own Ltd. His company earns it's income from the work he performs.
As has been said above, this is twisted. The words used are to lead us down a personal services path. That is not how I work. My client wants a graphics driver or a working test environment or full set of requirements or whatever I happen to be working on. They pay me by the hour to produce those things. They may pay me to produce those things one after the other. They may pay me for sub sets of those, but it is the finished product they are paying for. If that product was not up to scratch or was not delivered then I would expect not to be paid, have to put right the error or to have to pay back part or all of what I have already been paid.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostI really don't like the way they talk about providing services to a client "through" a company. I bet HMRC don't talk about their employees providing a service to the taxpayer "through" HMRC. I work "for" my company, not "through" it, and I bet 99% of other people in employment do the same.Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by morpheus View PostI take it that's a no thenComment
-
Alternatively, if you didn't pay any dividends last year (as I didn't) you can leave it blank too:
Do not complete this box if all the income you derived from the company was employment income."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment