• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Inside IR35 but Ltd Co

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    Don't use terms like 'computing' or 'Consulting' in your co name. They specifically target such names.


    I think that they are more likely to target companies based on your SIC rather than the name that you give your company.

    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    Please provide links to backup your evidence.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #32
      They sort by the SIC first then by other factors including co name. Having fancy and or computing type names rasies your profile. Faqqer, what's your co name BTW?

      Want proof? As I said b4, I go by actual facts and what is more proof than the example of 'DragonFly Consulting'. Now if I were a Tax inspector, this name would jump out at me by a mile. Dragonfly Consulting what a juicy morsel this must be. Indeed it was and Gordo trousered 99K from this one.

      To sum up: HRMC is the predator, the 1 man Ltd is the prey. Stay low and inconspicuous.
      Last edited by Turion; 7 March 2008, 15:20.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Turion View Post
        They sort by the SIC first then by other factors including co name. Having fancy and or computing type names rasies your profile. Faqqer, what's your co name BTW?

        Want proof? As I said b4, I go by actual facts and what is more proof than the example of 'DragonFly Consulting'. Now if I were a Tax inspector, this name would jump out at me by a mile. Dragonfly Consulting what a juicy morsel this must be. Indeed it was and Gordo trousered 99K from this one.

        To sum up: HRMC is the predator, the 1 man PSC is the prey. Stay low and inconspicuous.
        No such thing as a PSC it lacks a legal definition, stop giving them more ammo for free!!!

        I would also disagree with the fact that shutting down the company makes you immune, it may reduce your chances of being investigated, but it definitely will not make you immune.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Turion View Post
          They sort by the SIC first then by other factors including co name. Having fancy and or computing type names rasies your profile. Faqqer, what's your co name BTW?

          Want proof? As I said b4, I go by actual facts and what is more proof than the example of 'DragonFly Consulting'. Now if I were a Tax inspector, this name would jump out at me by a mile. Dragonfly Consulting what a juicy morsel this must be. Indeed it was and Gordo trousered 99K from this one.

          To sum up: HRMC is the predator, the 1 man PSC is the prey. Stay low and inconspicuous.
          My company name is not something that I am disclosing on here.

          It does not feature the word Consulting, Computing, Solutions, Systems or anything like that, because the company does more than one thing, of which IT is just the main bit. It also gives me the flexibility to do anything different in the future that is non-IT related.

          What's a PSC, by the way????
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #35
            What's a PSC, by the way????

            Dunno, meant LTD. Must have slipped on the keyboard

            Comment


              #36
              Sorry to resurrect an old thread but this one got me thinking.

              I just started my Ltd and am searching for my first contract, I never plan to do a contract over 6 months, average contract is likely to be 3 months.
              Also I plan to get the contracts checked for IR35 and amended if possible. Though even if they are inside IR35 then I will probably disclose them as outside. I understand the majority of investigation cases are for larger contracts, so my question is this, is what I am planning on doing consistent with other contractors here on the forum?

              Comment


                #37
                ...anyone?

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by wildkat View Post
                  Sorry to resurrect an old thread but this one got me thinking.

                  I just started my Ltd and am searching for my first contract, I never plan to do a contract over 6 months, average contract is likely to be 3 months.
                  Also I plan to get the contracts checked for IR35 and amended if possible. Though even if they are inside IR35 then I will probably disclose them as outside. I understand the majority of investigation cases are for larger contracts, so my question is this, is what I am planning on doing consistent with other contractors here on the forum?
                  So, what you are saying is, that even if you are advised that you should be paying taxes under IR35, then you are going to ignore that and not pay them?

                  That is tax evasion and can land you in jail......

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X