Originally posted by THEPUMA
Sorry, the point I was making about precedent to spiderman was simply that it deosn't become less valid just because it is 30 odd years old.
I originally posted the link up in response to, I think, bigbird simply because it was a case about lunches. Whether it would impact in this situation (or could be cited) I don't know. As I said elsewhere I have personally got my own lunch claims through an investigation so it is not an absolute no-no.
Comment