Originally posted by Gonzo
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Expensing and iPod..
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Yes he did.Originally posted by Maxamusdid he get away with it?
His justification was that "he is a big bloke so needs a big screen for giving presentations". The fact that it never moved from his sitting room wall because it took six people to lift it did not seem to matter.
However, I don't know what the outcome of his IR35 dispute was so it could all have been academic.Comment
-
I could do with a bigger Ipod and the New Nokia N95 !
But really I dont see what the benefits are doing such a thing (i.e buying Fixed assets) on a flatRate VAT scheme. correct me if i am wrong but
1) capital expenditures do not reduce your corp tax, except for a little depreciation ?
2) you will only be saving on tax on dividend had you had taken the money out in the first place to buy the fixed asset. But then again the FA is not yours but you company's.
So whats the point, its all a false Economy any way. I would like to buy a bigger 80Gb IPOD and a NOkia N95 (business use off course
) but figures dont look any better buying as a Ltd co. expenditure.
css_jay99Comment
-
sometimes it can work, sometimes not. Basically you get capital allowances at the usual rate for the asset class in question which reduces the CT liablility, then there is generally a balancing charge/allowance at the assets actual disposal. This being the difference between its book value and the actual price realised.Originally posted by css_jay99I could do with a bigger Ipod and the New Nokia N95 !
But really I dont see what the benefits are doing such a thing (i.e buying Fixed assets) on a flatRate VAT scheme. correct me if i am wrong but
1) capital expenditures do not reduce your corp tax, except for a little depreciation ?
2) you will only be saving on tax on dividend had you had taken the money out in the first place to buy the fixed asset. But then again the FA is not yours but you company's.
So whats the point, its all a false Economy any way. I would like to buy a bigger 80Gb IPOD and a NOkia N95 (business use off course
) but figures dont look any better buying as a Ltd co. expenditure.
css_jay99
If you then have personal use this is taxable as a BIK, normally at 10% of the book value. So, this can potentially be a good way of funding rapidly decreasing assets. e.g.
Company buys lawn tractor for 5k. In 2 years it sells it to director for 2k (fair market value). Company saves 600 quid corp tax. Director pay BIK tax on approx 800 quid (160/320).
Essentially therefore the initial depreciation has been paid for out of pretax rather than post tax income. I think now this is something that the HMRC have clamped down somewhat over the last few years so there may be very few things it has any chance of working with. Garden machinery was one.
As ever check current position with accountants.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment