Originally posted by Mustang
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Diversifying?
Collapse
X
-
Also won't Mrs Mustang have to do Risk Assesments and submit to kiddie fiddling background check thingyHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think -
Mrs Mustang is using private pools, primarily due to the age group she will teach and the fact the pools have to therefore be at 30 degC.Originally posted by TrollI'm very anti this - when the young trolls were learning to swim the local lifeguards used to teach them while I went off to do my lengths..along came a company who provided swimming lessons, lifeguards were issued a letter by the council telling them to stop giving lessons and the fecking swimming company demanded one of the lanes be reserved for their exclusive use !
Plus once the operation was up and running they didn't have enough teachers to cope with demand!
I wasn't sure about councils rights to grant exclusive monopolies for public amenitiesLast edited by Mustang; 21 February 2007, 17:13.Comment
-
Yes and YesOriginally posted by TrollAlso won't Mrs Mustang have to do Risk Assesments and submit to kiddie fiddling background check thingy
Those are two seperate issues and unconnected to the original post! They will have to be done whether it is a seperate LTD or not!!Comment
-
Yes but most posts go off on tangents... didn't want this one to be any differentOriginally posted by MustangYes and Yes
Those are two seperate issues and unconnected to the original post! They will have to be done whether it is a seperate LTD or not!!How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Originally posted by oraclesmithMrs Mustang will have to charge VAT from day one if Mr Mustangs business is registered and she's trading as part of it. For a B2C company this means needlessly high prices for the customer and trading at a disadvantage compared to one-man band coaches.
Agreed - that is certainly in favour of having a seperate LTD
Doesn't this apply in both scenarios? i.e. if she is part of MyCo, MyCO can claim the VAT back and offset them against profit.Originally posted by oraclesmithAlso if Mrs Mustang has set up costs (eg. publicity) and purchases capital items (training equipment) then she will be able to get all or most of the VAT back if she's eventually has to register for VAT, if she's a separate company, and can set most of these against profits.
I will certainly read up on these.Originally posted by oraclesmithYou need to see the artificial separation rules which HMRC use, to determine if the businesses are close enough to warrant coming under one VAT umbrella.
Bottom line: We will talk to my accountant before I make a final decision - I was just seeing the panel's opinion.Comment
-
How much does it cost to rent a private pool? will the pool insurance cover her activities?Originally posted by MustangMrs Mustang is using private pools, primarily due to the age group she will teach and the fact the pools have to therefore be at 30 degC.
Also back to the original point - when I setup another un-related company but wanted to finance out of existing company, accountant said to record it as consultancy feesHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
It varies - anything from £10 to £20 per hour. If it doesn't she will get her own insurance.Originally posted by TrollHow much does it cost to rent a private pool? will the pool insurance cover her activities?
Thanks for the tip. At the end of the day it doesnt make a difference to me. I want to ensure I do it the easiest and most tax eficient way.Originally posted by Trollwhen I setup another un-related company but wanted to finance out of existing company, accountant said to record it as consultancy feesComment
-
It depends on MyCo's situation. It's my understanding that a newly registered company can reclaim VAT (goods 3 years prior to registration, services 6 months). If MyCo has been registered for VAT and trading for a long time and is on flat rate scheme then no chance of reclaiming VAT on Mrs Mustangs purchases. In my opinion.Originally posted by MustangDoesn't this apply in both scenarios? i.e. if she is part of MyCo, MyCO can claim the VAT back and offset them against profit.
Also there are first year capital allowances against corp tax that Mrs Mustang may miss out on if her business is just an additional business activity of your firm. You should really see an accountant because there are many variables involved, including how HMRC regard the split between activities.Last edited by oraclesmith; 21 February 2007, 17:51.It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. www.areyoupopular.mobiComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment