feepayer responsibility in IR35 chain

[WordIsBond]

Are you guys interchangeable (subbing for each other)? Do you have different roles you fulfill or are you in the same role and just deciding which of you fills it today?

[eek]

Having permanent employees working for them.

Still doesn't work - you need would need the entire project team as employers and being playing to the letter of that contract you would also not be able to send a share holder to any meetings on site - although it would allow me to insist on conference calls instead.

When I hit this next time round I'm tempted to have and use a separate "You are messing us around" price list with a 25% premium.

[bloatymcbloat]

Are you guys interchangeable (subbing for each other)? Do you have different roles you fulfill or are you in the same role and just deciding which of you fills it today?

The SOW just states we should provide 2 bodies and not us as named people. This is why its a fairly solid substitution clause and one thats been used by other suppliers several times who have rotated people off the client.

[bloatymcbloat]

Still doesn't work - you need would need the entire project team as employers and being playing to the letter of that contract you would also not be able to send a share holder to any meetings on site - although it would allow me to insist on conference calls instead.

When I hit this next time round I'm tempted to have and use a separate "You are messing us around" price list with a 25% premium.

Yep thats what im worried about - that we as shareholders of the company shouldn't be doing any work based on the new amendment wording.