I'm curious to know what you would've done had we said "yes". You're not about to decline the work, I assume. There's nothing you can do about HMRC's risk assessment process, but this would be a pretty weak indicator, as most businesses have fluctuating income. Indeed, you can't get much more consistent w/r to income than employment.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Unusual billing and VAT
Collapse
X
-
-
Got you.Originally posted by pr1 View PostIf that's the case (that they'll definitely pay it within a few weeks i.e. within the same quarter) - it probably won't matter
On invoice accounting you'd have to pay the 6 months of VAT up front, which might affect your cash flow (it at least would mean you'd take money out of your business savings account) - could cause you problems if they then changed their mind and you had to rescind the invoices
On cash accounting you wait until the invoices are paid to pay the VAT, there's no reason (that I have ever been convinced by) for any contractor turning over less than £1.35m/year not to be on it - which probably covers all of us... except maybe MrMarkyMark
Yep, I am on cash accounting, but I didn't understand the relevance. I didn't mention it in the original post, but yes, they want billed and to pay before the end of financial year.Comment
-
haha, of course not!!Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostI'm curious to know what you would've done had we said "yes". You're not about to decline the work, I assume. There's nothing you can do about HMRC's risk assessment process, but this would be a pretty weak indicator, as most businesses have fluctuating income. Indeed, you can't get much more consistent w/r to income than employment.
just wondered if it might cause any issues.
It is a v good position to be in.Comment
-
Yes, I really wouldn't worry about it. I've had VAT returns that vary massively and it's a non-issue. Now, if I could only get my accountants to understand the VAT reverse charge...Originally posted by jmo21 View Posthaha, of course not!!
just wondered if it might cause any issues.
It is a v good position to be in.
It's the accuracy and internal consistency of the return that you want to worry about.
Comment
-
Think there's a rule against doing that generally though, which might "raise a flag" if you suddenly invoiced for 6 months worth of work (on invoice accounting) the month before you come off the FRS schemeOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostHappy days indeed.
As others have said, as long as you've got it documented and the bank statements to prove that you've been paid, then all is good (suits you to be paid before April to for the VAT collection boost.)
Can't remember the name of itComment
-
Who said he's coming off the scheme? May as well stay on it for the next two reporting periods at least.Originally posted by pr1 View PostThink there's a rule against doing that generally though, which might "raise a flag" if you suddenly invoiced for 6 months worth of work (on invoice accounting) the month before you come off the FRS scheme
Can't remember the name of itThe greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
If he's getting paying the VAT received on the next 6 months of invoices today, why wouldn't he then come off the scheme given the 16.5% change? That's 6 months of accountancy payments he can now claim the VAT back on, for startersOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostWho said he's coming off the scheme? May as well stay on it for the next two reporting periods at least.
or am I missing something?Comment
-
I personally consider highly variable income as a good indicator of non-standard (9-5 x 5) working practices. I.e. I am not a permie.Comment
-
+1, absolutelyOriginally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostI personally consider highly variable income as a good indicator of non-standard (9-5 x 5) working practices. I.e. I am not a permie.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
I am FD for a local charity, and last quarter we had a £17k Vat refund due (usually pay £2-3k), I was expecting an Inspection.
In the end we just got a "can you explain, please show workings, copies of 6 biggest invoices". refund was posted a week or so later.
As others have said, if it's just normal business fluctuation I wouldn't stress about it.Last edited by Pherlopolus; 1 March 2017, 13:18.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment