Hi everyone,
I am brand new to the forums and contracting and was hoping you could help please.
In a nutshell, I am a freelance writer and left my FT job in October 2016 to set up as a contractor. The client I am currently contracted under does not have the ability to hire permanent members of staff for whatever reasons, so I was given the option by the agency who recruited me to be employed via either an Umbrella company or to set up my own limited company. I initially opted for the former, and for the first few months was paid via an umbrella. I noticed that my take home pay was significantly lower than expected, around £600 less per month, I believe due to Employer's NI. I then decided to go for the limited company option, and have set up my company in the last week.
I am currently contracted through a recruitment agency, who provided my contract, pays me and who deals with the client at the other end. I had an IR35 expert look at the contract and it failed as it looks too much like I could be a permanent employee. I have asked them if the contract could be amended, but even if it can, I believe the working practises are more important in this case, and admittedly, I could be deemed to be working in much the same was a permanent employee, particularly as I currently only produce work for one client at the moment (I work for them approx 40 hours a week). My questions are:
- If I had more than one client and took on some extra work, would this make me more likely to be operating outside of IR35 as far as HMRC are concerned?
- If my contract was unable to be amended accordingly and I had to operate my business within IR35, is it really worth having a limited company? Would I be better off continuing via the umbrella company?
Thank you in advance for your help and apologies for my ignorance, I'm very new to all of this!
Goldi
I am brand new to the forums and contracting and was hoping you could help please.
In a nutshell, I am a freelance writer and left my FT job in October 2016 to set up as a contractor. The client I am currently contracted under does not have the ability to hire permanent members of staff for whatever reasons, so I was given the option by the agency who recruited me to be employed via either an Umbrella company or to set up my own limited company. I initially opted for the former, and for the first few months was paid via an umbrella. I noticed that my take home pay was significantly lower than expected, around £600 less per month, I believe due to Employer's NI. I then decided to go for the limited company option, and have set up my company in the last week.
I am currently contracted through a recruitment agency, who provided my contract, pays me and who deals with the client at the other end. I had an IR35 expert look at the contract and it failed as it looks too much like I could be a permanent employee. I have asked them if the contract could be amended, but even if it can, I believe the working practises are more important in this case, and admittedly, I could be deemed to be working in much the same was a permanent employee, particularly as I currently only produce work for one client at the moment (I work for them approx 40 hours a week). My questions are:
- If I had more than one client and took on some extra work, would this make me more likely to be operating outside of IR35 as far as HMRC are concerned?
- If my contract was unable to be amended accordingly and I had to operate my business within IR35, is it really worth having a limited company? Would I be better off continuing via the umbrella company?
Thank you in advance for your help and apologies for my ignorance, I'm very new to all of this!
Goldi
Comment