• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Assign Income to Accounting Year Received

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Cirrus View Post
    For VAT you can choose to pay according to what money you actually received during the quarter in question rather than when such flows were invoiced, so for the last week's work in a month you could assign that to the month you worked or the following month when they paid you (as long as you are consistent).

    As my accounting year starts in June, and I intend not to be working in June onwards, it would suit me to have the last May invoice to be assigned to next year's accounts on the basis it didn't get paid until into the new year. This would make it easier for me to pull another £40k out of the company into my SIPP and get £8k CT relief.

    Do you know if that is allowable? I could see they wouldn't like that because unlike VAT you have scope to reduce CT. Bear in mind my accountant only gets my transaction lists so he wouldn't automatically know which year the payment was invoiced.
    Hi Cirrus,

    I'm not sure when you are wanting to make the next £40k SIPP contribution but you may be able to extend your year end to make it easier to make the contribution and avoid a loss carry back situation.

    That said, I've inferred that you'll be wanting to make the contribution next April so the above probably wouldn't help.

    Martin
    Contratax Ltd

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Lance View Post
      perhaps you're over thinking this.

      What if the services you are delivering aren't completed till the 1st June? You couldn't invoice before then anyway. Problem solved.
      Perhaps you're under thinking this.

      As ASB noted above, you have to properly value "work in progress" as having accrued.

      OP: Your accountant only gets the transaction list, but does he not ask about work in progress at the end of the year? If not, he's remiss....

      You could presumably change the end of your company's tax year and bring it forward. Seems unlikely to be worth it, though. I'd just make the pension contribution, generating a loss for next year, and carry it back. You aren't doing anything wrong, though I wouldn't start any MVL proceedings or anything like that until a seemly period of time after you make the payment. Are you retiring, going permie, resigning from the human race? Are you closing your company or just putting it to sleep for a while while you stimulate the tourist economies of Mediterranean countries?

      It's easy to justify if the company stays open, if you close it down the next day then they could come back and argue the payment served no business purpose.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View Post
        Hi Cirrus,

        I'm not sure when you are wanting to make the next £40k SIPP contribution but you may be able to extend your year end to make it easier to make the contribution and avoid a loss carry back situation.

        That said, I've inferred that you'll be wanting to make the contribution next April so the above probably wouldn't help.

        Martin
        Contratax Ltd
        Hi, Martin, I was writing mine when you posted this. I thought his goal was to get the income into the next tax year, since he won't be working then. If that's the case, isn't shortening this tax year the better solution? I'm not sure the rules on how far that can be done retroactively, but if he shortened to, say, the end of February, he'd get three months of income from this year into the succeeding tax year.

        Seems to me a lot of trouble, though, to avoid something that is perfectly legal just because it might raise red flags. Unless OP has other issues of concern so really doesn't want scrutiny.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
          Hi, Martin, I was writing mine when you posted this. I thought his goal was to get the income into the next tax year, since he won't be working then. If that's the case, isn't shortening this tax year the better solution? I'm not sure the rules on how far that can be done retroactively, but if he shortened to, say, the end of February, he'd get three months of income from this year into the succeeding tax year.

          Seems to me a lot of trouble, though, to avoid something that is perfectly legal just because it might raise red flags. Unless OP has other issues of concern so really doesn't want scrutiny.
          Perhaps yes, it just depends on when the previous contribution was made and when the next is to be made. If he wants to stick another £40k in to the SIPP in April 2017 then shortening is probably the way to go, if he wants to stick £40k in once the last invoice is paid then extending would be the way to go. Either way there should be something that can be doing to get the right outcome.

          It might be a bit of extra work to avoid potential red flags but for me it would seem worth it as no one likes HMRC sniffing around, especially in the current climate. There is always the chance that they deny CT relief on the basis the contribution wasn't for the purpose of trade as it's caused a trading loss and then you get stuck having to argue the position with them.

          Martin
          Contratax Ltd

          Comment


            #15
            Thanks, Martin. As usual, you make a lot of sense.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View Post
              Perhaps yes, it just depends on when the previous contribution was made and when the next is to be made. If he wants to stick another £40k in to the SIPP in April 2017 then shortening is probably the way to go, if he wants to stick £40k in once the last invoice is paid then extending would be the way to go. Either way there should be something that can be doing to get the right outcome.

              It might be a bit of extra work to avoid potential red flags but for me it would seem worth it as no one likes HMRC sniffing around, especially in the current climate. There is always the chance that they deny CT relief on the basis the contribution wasn't for the purpose of trade as it's caused a trading loss and then you get stuck having to argue the position with them.

              Martin
              Contratax Ltd
              Is it still the case that extending the accounting period has to be done before the end of the period ? If so then the OP needs to be fairly quick if they wish to do so. AA01 can be submitted online now I believe though.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by ASB View Post
                Is it still the case that extending the accounting period has to be done before the end of the period ? If so then the OP needs to be fairly quick if they wish to do so. AA01 can be submitted online now I believe though.
                You can generally change the year end at any point, provided the normal filing deadline hasn't already passed i.e. the accounts aren't already late. However, you can't normally extend the year end more than once in a 5 year period.

                Martin
                Contratax Ltd

                Comment

                Working...
                X