Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
MVL and Ltd Company to Umbrella ?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by NickX View PostI wouldn't be planning to do 2 years under the brolly - probably around 6-12 months before retiring.
1) based on the above, why not delay liquidating for 6-12 months?
2) if you're concerned about possible upcoming rule changes (and whilst I've not specifically heard any rumours of a change here, it's almost inevitable it'll be stomped on at some point), and you've got a hefty war chest to enjoy following liquidation, why bother working for another 6-12 months?
My overall view is that brolly post liquidating is most likely safe...but with a big war chest and you being on the brink of retirement, to me seems a bit of a risk for a few months extra work?Comment
-
Originally posted by Maslins View PostA couple of thoughts from this:
1) based on the above, why not delay liquidating for 6-12 months?
2) if you're concerned about possible upcoming rule changes (and whilst I've not specifically heard any rumours of a change here, it's almost inevitable it'll be stomped on at some point), and you've got a hefty war chest to enjoy following liquidation, why bother working for another 6-12 months?
My overall view is that brolly post liquidating is most likely safe...but with a big war chest and you being on the brink of retirement, to me seems a bit of a risk for a few months extra work?
Well, I think you probably are seeing between the lines fairly accurately.
I am concerned about potential changes to the rules. The 10% Entrepreneurs Relief is certainly very attractive and I would be frustrated if I left it too late and this tax advantage was removed.
With regard whether to bother working another 6-12months, the retirement is quite a big step for me, and I was kind of thinking of "winding down" by working some shorter contracts then taking longer breaks. I suppose just trying to make the transition from full time work to retirement a little less final. I also have clients still calling me trying to get me back to help and I genuinely like to help if I can.
Hence the thought of being able to work via an umbrella company is quite attractive.
I appreciate this probably sounds like wanting my cake and eating it too. I have around £300k accrued in the Limited Company so I guess you are right, a few extra months may not make that much odds.
Many Thanks,
NickComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment