Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The survey on the HMRC Consultation regarding Travel Expenses is up
Collapse
X
-
I was just wondered that while Jeremy Corbyn is doing his 'man of the people' stint, with questions being put directly to the PM from the public, is it possible to craft a question that could highlight the disparity between small / big business and ask that it be re-examined? When the questions were being read out today, he was saying that he had 1000 queries on the question on mental health. I'd be pretty sure that that number could be beaten easily enough. One for the Big Group maybe? -
Wasn't that just a one off for his first PMQ's?? If it's an ongoing thing we could give it a goOriginally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostI was just wondered that while Jeremy Corbyn is doing his 'man of the people' stint, with questions being put directly to the PM from the public, is it possible to craft a question that could highlight the disparity between small / big business and ask that it be re-examined? When the questions were being read out today, he was saying that he had 1000 queries on the question on mental health. I'd be pretty sure that that number could be beaten easily enough. One for the Big Group maybe?Comment
-
Definitely worth a go, because it's supposedly being continued. However, I suspect this is a flaw in JC's plan, depending on how he intends to source these questions, because other interest groups will be thinking exactly the same thing.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostWasn't that just a one off for his first PMQ's?? If it's an ongoing thing we could give it a goComment
-
Don't suppose you know how you go about submitting a question do you?Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostDefinitely worth a go, because it's supposedly being continued. However, I suspect this is a flaw in JC's plan, depending on how he intends to source these questions, because other interest groups will be thinking exactly the same thing.Comment
-
How do I do that?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostThey could respond to the consultation directly.Comment
-
Unfortunately not. However, re-reading his intro to PMQs:Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostDon't suppose you know how you go about submitting a question do you?
It sounds as though he's sourcing questions from a particular list, such as Labour party members perhaps.I thought at my first PMQs, I would do it in a slightly different way... So I sent out an email to thousands of people and asked them what questions they would like to put to the prime minister and I received 40,000 replies.
I'm not sure whether using his constituency contact would work, but I'd guess not.
Comment
-
Yep that sounds about rightOriginally posted by jamesbrown View PostUnfortunately not. However, re-reading his intro to PMQs:
It sounds as though he's sourcing questions from a particular list, such as Labour party members perhaps.
I'm not sure whether using his constituency contact would work, but I'd guess not.
Never mind, it was a good idea
Comment
-
https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...nd-subsistenceOriginally posted by Martin Scroatman View PostHow do I do that?
The questions that they're looking for responses to are on p23. The email address is at the bottom of the document, and on the landing page.
Try and present your arguments in response to the questions asked.Comment
-
I did thatOriginally posted by mudskipper View Posthttps://www.gov.uk/government/consul...nd-subsistence
The questions that they're looking for responses to are on p23. The email address is at the bottom of the document, and on the landing page.
Try and present your arguments in response to the questions asked.
May not make any difference but if lots of us do it then it just might...
Actually who am I kidding. They don't care, they just want more tax out of us. but just maybe...Comment
-
The important thing is to come up with actual, identifiable cases that show that it's bad for freelancing.
Anything else is just going to be discarded as anecdotal evidence, but if you can show that you spend 30% of your turnover on travel and subsistence then they cannot argue that there is no evidence to disprove their allegation.
The more people that are prepared to put their hands up and say "this hurts my business in this specific way" the better.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Comment