What everyone else said. Invoice normally follow the process and dont get into an argument. PRocess through claims if needs be.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
End Client not signing time sheets-options
Collapse
X
-
-
-
The wording of the legislation is ambiguous:Originally posted by iptuser View Postthanks for the replies- how strong is the last comment. I`ve read that the opt out must be in place before any introduction - is this correct? If so every "opt out" request is not valid since most agencies state it after an interview, contract etc
Agents read "introduction" as "introduction into the workplace" rather than "we have introduced you to the contractor, and now you can reasonably identify them".provided that such notice is given before the introduction or supply of the work-seeker
Without a legal precedent, we don't have that clarity. Also, if you look at BIS vs CNL, part of that case hinged on the agency saying "ah, we aren't an employment business (even though the contract says we are an employment business!), and therefore we aren't bound by the regulations so there is nothing to opt out of".
I'd get the invoice in. I'd get the facts together so that you can argue it. And then if you still don't get paid then either file a small claims court case against the agency or speak to a professional about it.Comment
-
They get give you a legal opinion on that piece of legislation through their legal helpline, but to be honest last time I got a legal opinion through them for something on it it was what I thought already.Originally posted by iptuser View PostDoes any use Ipse?
any feedback
Basically it's as Faqqer says - that law is ambiguous, so anything involving that law is open to interpretation until a judge rules on your particular case."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment