• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Does Anyone Know a good solicitor??

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    - you cannot bring an action - under the contract - against the client. you have no contract with them. Any claim needs to be against the agency.

    - your potential claim needs to be against the agency. you may be able to use employment law to your advantage, if the entire termination procedure was not followed correctly then you may have a case [even though you are on contract you are PROBABLY a worker under employment legislation with the associated protection]

    - the question of competence is always highly subjective. What would I think when presented with the evidence? Your evidence is, essentially, "well they are sort of making it up by painting me in the worst light possible".

    - arguably you could try a defamation suit against the client, if you have a few hundred k to spare. However, given the subjective nature of the question of competency, and also the fact that it is not widely circulated (except by you) it would be very hard to assess any real level of damage. [Though reputational damage is pricy].

    - if you barrister friend is any sort of employment expert and he uses direct access then you could engage him directly. A warning shot might yield some benefit (though unlikely, the client will have bigger and more expensive lawyers and deeper pockets).

    - you could also ask him, in the absence of direct access, who usually engages.

    fwiw I think the probably should pay the notice period. But when it comes to going to law you need very deep pockets. And the legal profession simply adores people who are litigating based on a principle.
    Thanks for the Adice

    Comment


      #12
      Thanks for all the Advice Guys

      Comment


        #13
        Bummer. But tulipe happens. Even to permies.....

        Had it once as perm. Company couldnt be arsed to follow redundancy procedure so hiked up some 'charges' for a few people and said, sign agreement or we'll suspend you and sack you eventually. Of course, not worth the hassle to fight. I remember the 'reasons' they came up with - it was laughable thats all the could think of.

        But yep thats what they all do - make something up to get rid of. No hassle no notice. Yet if we did the same clients would go mad.

        If it was me I'd have a tilt at getting notice period off the agency. Worth a go - cheap enough to take to small claims court and might be a laugh.

        Getting a solictor - nah. Costs too much and you wont get anywhere.
        Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by terrythompson View Post
          Hi Guys,

          Been on here a while but first post. I'm looking for a solicitor to take a company to court over a wrongful termination of contract. I had been working at this company for 3 months without any issues whatsoever, then out of the blue I get a call from my agency saying the company have terminated my contract with immediate effect. When I asked why they stated that " I did not meet the required level of expertise for the role" this was complete news to me and also my immediate manager who I asked the question about my work. I had been given no notice of any issues with my work at any point and indeed my immediate manger was happy with my work (his words). This came from senior management who I had had no dealings with. I was supposed to be on a month's notice but due to them stating the above they were saying they could terminate my contract with immediate effect. I have looked into this and spoken to a barrister friend of mine and he states they would need to prove a level of incompetence or gross misconduct in order to terminate my contract in this manner. I asked them for specific instances of where I had not performed as expected. they came back with 4 instances that had been completely doctored to make it seem that the fault or the issue was down to me.
          After I left I spoke with a number of other contractors who worked there and found that several contractors had been let go in exactly the same manner, so basically I found that they had either gone over budget or run out of funds and didn't want to pay any of the contractors a month's notice in wages so decided to use a false accusation as grounds to immediately terminate the contracts.

          I would like to fight this, not just because of the money we've all been there with contracts terminated prematurely but also I am unhappy with the slur on my technical ability I think the way they have gone about things has been totally disgusting and i don't think they should be allowed to get away with it. Can someone please help?

          Thanks

          Terry.
          Let me help you.

          Going to court is a nightmare. It is expensive and even if you win you will not get all your costs back. Apart from the cost the mental exhausation that it will put you through is shocking. It can easily break you.

          Court should only be used by the brave where there are big sums at stake and where you have tried every other alternative. I went through this recently and it nearly broke me

          You are a contractor - That comes with the thick and the thin. Not being given notice is not nice but brush yourself down and move on.

          There are tons of jobs at the moment and the service industry (software dev / hardware dev) is really picking up

          Comment

          Working...
          X