• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Resource Manager doesn't get it

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by GettingBy View Post
    I am new to contracting, so this is more of a question that me making a point - but I thought that a clause like this would show control (master/servant)?
    The IR35 rules are vague & nebulous bulltulip. It does sound like control, but it's also perfectly reasonable for a client to agree terms on the basis that you will always be there for the duration. I think the control has to be at a lower level to make any sense as an employment indicator.
    Last edited by SpontaneousOrder; 11 September 2014, 19:56.

    Comment


      #12
      I, generally, don't see any difference between perms and contractors. I went perm just for convenience reasons, but I'm afraid I have to report back that you could describe permies as disguised contractors.

      The debate on contractors vs permies is a bit like the one about which side up you should eat your egg.

      Personally I think it's pot luck if you were investigated as to whether you'd pass.
      I'm alright Jack

      Comment

      Working...
      X