Contractor UK Bulletin Board  PayStream

Go Back   Contractor UK Bulletin Board > Contractor UK Forums > Technical
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22nd September 2008, 09:21   #1
birdy-numnum
Not worth listening to
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Default XP, VMware and 4Gb memory

I'm considering buying a laptop running XP as a host O/S. I'm after a fairly high spec as I'll be running Virtual Machines using VMWare. I've got my eye on a Thinkpad, possibly a T61p, or an HP 6910p.

However, my question is about memory usage in VMWare.

XP can only see 3Gb I'm told. However, I've heard that VMWare can 'see' the full 4Gb. Does anyone know if this is correct? Can I run the host o/s with 1Gb and two VM's with 1.5Gb each using VMWare?
birdy-numnum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2008, 09:44   #2
London75
Lurker not a fighter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 60
Default

Yes and no.

To get full usage of 4GB upwards, you would do much better in installing Linux with the free VMWare server product on top and run XP as another of the VMs, you'd lose some (10% ish) performance in XP but over all, the Virtual Machines would probably work better.

Windows 32 bit can "see" 4GB but up to 500MB worth of addresses are used for the hardware in the computer so chances are you'll get about 3.5GB visible which you should be able to allocate to VMs, you also need to play with the /3GB and /PAE switches, not sure what would be best for a standalone laptop but google them and there's plenty of advice, gut feeling is you'd use both switches in your boot.ini if perservering with XP that is.

You don't need a particularly meaty computer either, I've been running for years with a few different laptops and a 1GHz CPU is adequate for 3 VMS working on the basis that really only one can be doing "CPU" stuff at a time, the one you're working in!

Disk is the real problem so I'd ignore CPU and graphics and go for one of the new laptops that has two disks. That will give you the single best performance increase of any of the components.
London75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2008, 13:41   #3
NickFitz
Super poster
 
NickFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Your local branch
Posts: 2,601
Default

Surprisingly enough, it's complicated.

This is a subject Raymond Chen from MS has addressed several times:

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ar...14/699521.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ar...18/216492.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ar...05/208908.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/ar...17/215682.aspx

... and more
NickFitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:43.


Advertisers
PayStream

CUK Navigation

Contractor Alliance
Formed a new Ltd Co?

20% off business insurance
£10 off Bauer & Cottrell contract reviews
Find co-workers & client introductions

Increase your value to clients here

Fast Company Formation
Same day online company formation £75 + VAT

Form your Ltd Co Here

Contractor Services


 
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.