 |
|
28th November 2008, 14:28
|
#71
|
|
More fingers than teeth
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,805
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalOptimist
do you want to know what cathode 'bounce' is
*smug b@stard warning*

|
Go on then, enlighten us...
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 14:38
|
#72
|
|
Super poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Castle Saburac
Posts: 3,837
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeitghost
Go on then, enlighten us...
|
oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.
interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.

__________________
I have decided on my career path. I will become a nun. Sister, please come clean if you wish to avoid a fisting - Jeremy Bender
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 14:46
|
#73
|
|
Super poster
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,302
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalOptimist
oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.
interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.

|
Pretty much everything has mass when it changes direction, even massless things.
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 14:47
|
#74
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,923
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalOptimist
oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.
interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.

|
There was a small dimple in my understanding of our World that has now been filled. Thank you.
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 14:50
|
#75
|
|
Super poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Castle Saburac
Posts: 3,837
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimberWolf
Pretty much everything has mass when it changes direction, even massless things.
|
There is an object in the universe that can change direction so quickly that it can be proven to have no mass, yet the inertia is so great that it must have infinite mass.
It's called my project manager

__________________
I have decided on my career path. I will become a nun. Sister, please come clean if you wish to avoid a fisting - Jeremy Bender
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 15:18
|
#76
|
|
More fingers than teeth
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,805
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalOptimist
oh its one of those principles, thingies, you were talking about. like once you know them you can deduce the world.
IIRC there was a problem in amplifiers and the cause was that the electrons moved through the vacuum, hit the cathode but then bounced off before being reattracted. This proved that these things had mass. i.e. its a physical bounce rather than a magnetic type one.
interesting if you do a degree in ancient electronics, otherwise, useless, totally useless.

|
Gosh.
Even when I was doing my first attempt at a degree, vacuum state electronics wasn't on the curriculum.
Though we did do weird things like crts using magnetic & electrostatic deflection as I recall. Electron ballistics, that's what it was called.
No one younger than about 45 has ever heard of any of it.
Also did stuff about magnetic amplifiers which are even more obscure, despite being used in 99% of PC psus.
|
|
|
28th November 2008, 18:24
|
#77
|
|
Lurker not a fighter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasguru
Yes it has. 40 years ago science was respected and most people understood it was responsible for national wealth.
Now people are too stupid to make the connection.
|
national wealth is created by borrowing money, innit?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:45.
|  |
| Advertisers |
|
| Contractor Alliance |
Formed a new Ltd Co?
20% off business insurance
£10 off Bauer & Cottrell contract reviews
Find co-workers & client introductions
Increase your value to clients here
|
|