Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
Sorry Mal, you're still going around the same circle.
You are not taking this risk because of the incorporation. You are taking the risk because you have decided to freelance, which, as you yourself say, you could do in way that didn't involve incorporation.
The question still remains. Given that *everybody* who has decided to freelance is taking the same risks, why should a tax break only be available to those that decide to incorporate?
But it seems that you're not going to answer it.
I know that you think that there should be tax breaks available to people who take the risk of becoming a freelancer, and I agree with you. But this doesn't explain why there should be a rule making some freelancers more equal than others.
And HMG does see that there is a need for change after 15 years. It's because as another poster pointed out (and I have said before), the number of professions (e.g nursing, teaching) which has seen people incorporating, (often for no other reason than to take advantage of this tax break) has/will sky rocket. The desire to protect future tax revenue is a valid reason, whether you like it or not.
tim
Comment