Originally posted by woohoo
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Snail mode for simulating vast databases when using a small test database
Collapse
X
-
Contention due to data distribution is an issue to be aware of too. I've build a system before that ran like treacle through a sieve in test. it turned out that they were putting through hundreds of TPS using only 50 credit card numbers. When they added more credit card numbers it flew. -
Yep. I've seen it time and again where projects have been developed on the latest flashy kit but expected to run well on lesser machines. Graphics designers using gigantic screens and bags of RAM not thinking about the poor users with their commodity gear is one example. With SQL, there's a similar danger that developers might have fancy disk arrays or SSDs to develop on but the end users have to live with existing kit which already has a workload.Originally posted by minestrone View PostSticking data on the cloud won't fly for most organisations that have large databases.
Also many companies have test and dev databases that are considerably smaller than production.
I see the relevance of what owlhoot is suggesting.
Sounds better.Originally posted by minestrone View Post"But this page worked so much faster when we tested it before the release" is not an uncommon complaint.
Run the query on prod, stick that time 'estimate' into the DEV and UAT phases and give the users a real feel on how it will perform on prod.
The idea of restricting server RAM and loading up a test database on some USB2 disks has merit
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Today 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Yesterday 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23

Comment