Originally posted by SunnyInHades
View Post
Most of what you say is incorrect. Umbrella companies have based their employment contracts on minimum wage and bonuses for the last 4-5 years - way before the introduction of the AWR. The reason for this is that umbrella companies have to operate an overarching contract of employment and this requires, to be legally effective, mutuality of obligation and HMRC have determined that this will be represented by pay between assignments - please see Sir Christopher Slades comments here: Case Law: Clark v Oxfordshire Health Authority. This type of contract is required to create a series of temporary assignments under a permanent contract of employment as this is an accurate representation of the role of contractor.
The Swedish Derogation Model, as it became known, was being operated by all umbrella companies for many years and still should be in order for the overarching contract to be maintained. No umbrella company should be making deductions from the contractor for payment between assignments and neither should they be making those payments 'in advance', that completely goes against the spirit of the legislation.
Contractors will not be 'fleeced' by a reputable umbrella company. You need to bear in mind that there is one pot of money - to use your example £1000 per week. From this amount the following payments must be made:
Net pay to the contractor
Income tax to HMR&C
Employee's NI to HMR&C
Employer's NI to HMR&C
The balance (usually £80-£100 per month) is the income of the umbrella company - otherwise known as their margin.
HTH

Leave a comment: