Originally posted by saptastic
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: OTS Small Company Taxation Review
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "OTS Small Company Taxation Review"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostInteresting (worth watching), and it is a real problem both for the workers affected, and for the rest of us when any "solution" catches people it was never meant to target. He makes their case well. One of the things the new CRSE will be looking at is the characteristics of a vulnerable (self employed) worker, to assist with that distinction.Last edited by jamesbrown; 8 March 2016, 09:21.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostWatching Parliament TV and caught this Ten minute rule motion from 2 March. Illustrates the continued pressure from the opposite end of the spectrum (i.e. low-paid workers being stiffed by their "employers"). Not a great cocktail.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Watching Parliament TV and caught this Ten minute rule motion from 2 March. Illustrates the continued pressure from the opposite end of the spectrum (i.e. low-paid workers being stiffed by their "employers"). Not a great cocktail.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostYes, we can't add complexity through choice. We're too busy adding complexity by compulsion.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View Postthough that raises concerns with the OTS about adding complexity through choice
Leave a comment:
-
"1.43 Of all the topics we covered during this review, none were more divisive than look-through.
Respondents were generally either strongly against or strongly in favour; with accountants and
tax advisers generally against, small company owners generally in favour and representative
groups and bodies split between the two camps. One area where virtually all respondents were
in agreement was that if any look-through scheme was introduced, it should not be compulsory,
though that raises concerns with the OTS about adding complexity through choice (and of
course the implication that it could become a ‘lower tax’ choice)."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostTax objectives are continuously being packaged as something far more principled.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostThe Americans have look-through as an option. You can have a chapter C or a chapter S corporation, the latter is look-through.
It is a reasonable approach as an option, definitely helpful in many cases, a bad thing if enforced / required.
TBH, I'm rapidly losing interest in the entire, phoney, discussion. Tax objectives are continuously being packaged as something far more principled.
Leave a comment:
-
The Americans have look-through as an option. You can have a chapter C or a chapter S corporation, the latter is look-through.
It is a reasonable approach as an option, definitely helpful in many cases, a bad thing if enforced / required.
Leave a comment:
-
Here. Yep, not really surprising, and it isn't a new idea. Indeed, apportionment is a very old idea and something that HMT were supposedly exploring again.
Leave a comment:
-
OTS Small Company Taxation Review
First area of further investigation is recommended as 'look through'.
There's a surprise.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: