• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Version Management Tools to synchronize larger Devel groups"

Collapse

  • engineer
    replied
    This posting has been removed for certain reasons
    Last edited by engineer; 30 January 2017, 20:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Windows we use TFS

    *nix we use SVN

    Leave a comment:


  • garethevans1986
    replied
    SVN is fine for small teams but is a bitch to merge changes in.

    Mercurial is good for small and large teams over multiple projects and branches....a hell of a lot easier to merge projects and branches than SVN.

    GE

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    At ClientCo we use SVN on Windows for dev.

    We also use ClearCase on Unix, but personally think that is a dog.

    What OSs are being used?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    We've been using Mercurial for a while now at Permie Co., and I'm not so sure the upsides really outweigh the down. But it does work, and they have a couple of sites in the US, and three in the UK, and various other people working remotely by themselves, all working off one code base.

    Timezones don't come into it, as updating doesn't do anything as crude as comparing time (neither did subversion).

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Mercurial and Git come to mind.

    Both can do distrubuted version control.
    I forgot to add that various projects I have come across using those products are very definitely international in flavour, and therefore cope with different timezones.

    Leave a comment:


  • garethevans1986
    replied
    Software version control...+1 for Mercurial.

    GE

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Mercurial and Git come to mind.

    Both can do distrubuted version control.

    Leave a comment:


  • Version Management Tools to synchronize larger Devel groups

    This posting has been removed for certain reasons
    Last edited by engineer; 30 January 2017, 20:54.

Working...
X