Originally posted by Jaws
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Linq - checking for nulls
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Linq - checking for nulls"
Collapse
-
The e != null means it will include any elements in the collection that are not null. It does not account for a null collection which, if I understand correctly, is the cause of the problem here.
You could use the coalesce operator (??) to use an empty collection when the property value is null. For example if the type of the elements in the response.entitlements collection is Entitlement you'd do something like the following:
Code:var result = from e in response.entitlements ?? Enumerable.Empty<Entitlement>() where e != null // this may no longer be necessary select new {...}Last edited by Jaws; 28 December 2011, 22:47.
Leave a comment:
-
Linq - checking for nulls
Using the query syntax, how do you check if a collection is null?
var result = from e in response.entitlements where e != null
select new {...}
response.entitlements is an array & when it's null I get a null reference exception but according to MSDN this where clause should handle itTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:20
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 00:23
- ‘Stable’ IT contractor demand moved near growth in February 2026 Mar 10 06:49
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Mar 9 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45

Leave a comment: