• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Gosh. Stuff I never knew about Vista."

Collapse

  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Ta for that. What does 10 CALs give you in practice?
    Up to 10 clients can access the server, legally. Not sure how it is enforced, if at all, or if relevant in a closed environment such as messing around with at home, where you're unlikely to have 10 client devices trying to connect at the same time.

    This has some pretty pictures. Not bothered to read all the text.

    Microsoft Volume Licensing - Client Access License (CAL) Guide

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Under 40 notes including VAT if you can live with the restrictions of Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation Edition, branded here as Windows Homer Server 2011 due to a few bolt-ons that can be ignored or disabled.

    Microsoft Windows Home Server 2011 - 1 server, 10 CALs
    Ta for that. What does 10 CALs give you in practice?

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    While I haven't had chance to try out the R2 flavour, 2008 Server would be my preferred choice out of the Windows range. It's the most stable version of Windows I've run and has some very nice features. Pity about the price though.

    Under 40 notes including VAT if you can live with the restrictions of Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation Edition, branded here as Windows Homer Server 2011 due to a few bolt-ons that can be ignored or disabled.

    Microsoft Windows Home Server 2011 - 1 server, 10 CALs

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    That one was doing the rounds when Vista started shipping on new kit.

    It put us quite off the product.

    Moving on, Windows 2008 Server is apparently Vista with the crap stripped out.
    Ditto for Windows 2008 Server R2 in relation to Windows 7.

    While I haven't had chance to try out the R2 flavour, 2008 Server would be my preferred choice out of the Windows range. It's the most stable version of Windows I've run and has some very nice features. Pity about the price though.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Did Windows 7 inherit all that?

    Or was it all stripped out so M$ could say they've improved performance?

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    started a topic Gosh. Stuff I never knew about Vista.

    Gosh. Stuff I never knew about Vista.

    A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection
Working...
X