Originally posted by wurzel
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "WCF Service - sequence in XSD Complex Type definitions"
Collapse
-
Just wondering if it were possible to get the framework to do this rather than having to do it manuallyOriginally posted by DimPrawn View PostChange the XSD sequence to a choice
HTML Code:<xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xsd:element name="Folder" type="folderType" /> <xsd:element name="Bookmark" type="bookmarkType"/> </xsd:choice>
Leave a comment:
-
Change the XSD sequence to a choice
HTML Code:<xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xsd:element name="Folder" type="folderType" /> <xsd:element name="Bookmark" type="bookmarkType"/> </xsd:choice>
Leave a comment:
-
WCF Service - sequence in XSD Complex Type definitions
Anyway of stopping the .Net framework from imposing a sequence restriction on complex types?
We have a client who accesses our service via a handrolled SOAP message & every time we add a new field we get errors because they are not passing it in the correct position. (They should look at the WSDL but they just don't understand the concept. They don't even understand XML)
I don't see why sequence is important. Normally you can deserialise a known type from XML regardless of the order in which the elements appear.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: