- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Reg Exp Question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Reg Exp Question"
Collapse
-
I put off learning this stuff for 20 years in IT, but recently was forced to for a gig. It's actually pretty clever.
This I found very helpful:
Regular Expressions Reference - Basic Syntax
Is it a string in Java? I.e. do you mean: "\\d{9}"?
Failing that, I've always found it's better to make it match the start and end:
^\d{9}$
Leave a comment:
-
Same with me. Have read tons of stuff to make myself an expert at it but still cannot get my head around it at times. It really is the work of devil.Originally posted by minestrone View PostJava server faces code, validateRegExpr tag
[0-9]{9} looks promising, cheers.
I look at reg exp about once a year and always spend 10 minutes trying to get my head round it.
Leave a comment:
-
Java server faces code, validateRegExpr tagOriginally posted by yasockie View PostWhere are you evaluating your regexp?
In any case did you try [0-9]{9} or even [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] ?
[0-9]{9} looks promising, cheers.
I look at reg exp about once a year and always spend 10 minutes trying to get my head round it.
Leave a comment:
-
Where are you evaluating your regexp?
In any case did you try [0-9]{9} or even [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] ?
Leave a comment:
-
Reg Exp Question
I can never work this stuff out.
I am looking for a reg exp that only takes 9 numbers, what I have just now is "\d{9}" and it is letting . - and spaces through.
Anyone know a expression that suits?
Cheers.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: