- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Reg Exp Question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Reg Exp Question"
Collapse
-
I put off learning this stuff for 20 years in IT, but recently was forced to for a gig. It's actually pretty clever.
This I found very helpful:
Regular Expressions Reference - Basic Syntax
Is it a string in Java? I.e. do you mean: "\\d{9}"?
Failing that, I've always found it's better to make it match the start and end:
^\d{9}$
Leave a comment:
-
Same with me. Have read tons of stuff to make myself an expert at it but still cannot get my head around it at times. It really is the work of devil.Originally posted by minestrone View PostJava server faces code, validateRegExpr tag
[0-9]{9} looks promising, cheers.
I look at reg exp about once a year and always spend 10 minutes trying to get my head round it.
Leave a comment:
-
Java server faces code, validateRegExpr tagOriginally posted by yasockie View PostWhere are you evaluating your regexp?
In any case did you try [0-9]{9} or even [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] ?
[0-9]{9} looks promising, cheers.
I look at reg exp about once a year and always spend 10 minutes trying to get my head round it.
Leave a comment:
-
Where are you evaluating your regexp?
In any case did you try [0-9]{9} or even [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] ?
Leave a comment:
-
Reg Exp Question
I can never work this stuff out.
I am looking for a reg exp that only takes 9 numbers, what I have just now is "\d{9}" and it is letting . - and spaces through.
Anyone know a expression that suits?
Cheers.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46
- Loan charge recall issue returns, with new demands making UK contractors ‘half-suicidal’ Jun 10 03:58
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Jun 9 06:53
- Closing your limited company isn't failure. It's just the end of a chapter. Jun 8 05:00
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Jun 5 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Jun 4 04:22
- What are Bills of Exchange, and should HMRC's alert worry umbrella contractors? Jun 3 04:09
- Bills of Exchange fail to avoid new umbrella company rules, says HMRC Jun 2 05:32

Leave a comment: