- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: .NET interprocess communication
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ".NET interprocess communication"
Collapse
-
At the mo it's mainly hypothetical. It's a possible migration of a system. This has a number of different front ends. I'm just looking at options at the moment. One process would be preferable
-
Remoting isnt really as complex as it appears... simplist way is to specify the setup of channels, formatters, types etc in the config file, dont hardcode them for obvious reasons
Is the object you are calling into already instantiated, e.g. created by a windows service, or is it simply loading a DLL and calling a method? If the latter id look at using ApplicationDomain and loading the DLL into the same process, if possible in your circumstances.
Leave a comment:
-
Cheers guys. Look like I'll have a read up on remoting. The serialization cost is probably not an issue for me.
Leave a comment:
-
google eh? and you thought remoting was a faff?
"proper "Windows" unabstracted way of sending data." - ?????????????
mqgd's prompt of asynch vs synch is important. named pipes as above looks to be quite tightly coupled with thread blocking ocurring if the client fails to read completely. you might want something that is a bit looser?
Leave a comment:
-
.NET interprocess communication
Ok, I have a .NET process which needs to call an object in a different .NET process. Remoting just seems such a faff, any easier way ?
In COM for example just create a reference and call it. It will kindly start the process if it isn't running etc.
It seems there is a bit more to it than that with .NET.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: