- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Augmented Backus-Naur Form Parser
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Augmented Backus-Naur Form Parser"
Collapse
-
Are you threatening my Mac? Are you? Are you!Originally posted by DimPrawn.Net version 5 will have one. Honest.
Leave a comment:
-
That looks pretty good. Pity only in C++ but I can probably live with that.
Obviously a man with greater surfing skills than moi.
Any other offerings?
Leave a comment:
-
Parser generator I assume.Originally posted by threadedAre you wanting a parser or a parser generator?
I want to write a ABNF specification for a particular protocol and produce a parser for instances of messages using that protocol.
Leave a comment:
-
Ah, the resident genius.Originally posted by threadedDon't you mean "Extended" not "Augmented"?
Nope, I'm interested in Augmented as in RFC2234 which gives the <a>*<b>element augmentation.
Extended only gives the *, + and ? extentions.
Leave a comment:
-
Augmented Backus-Naur Form Parser
Come on you lot, make my day!
I've been looking at language parsers and have come to the conclusion that the Augmented BNF syntax would be ideal. The main reason being the ability to specify lengths of tokens rather than just 0 or more, 1 or more and so on as with straight or Extended BNF.
The problem is I have failed to find a shareware parser for Augmented BNF. I have found things like JavaCC and ANTLR but not one that states it is for Augmented BNF.
So, the questions is, have I missed something? Why aren't there ABNF parsers out there?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: