• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Hybrid drive MTBF

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hybrid drive MTBF"

Collapse

  • BoredBloke
    replied
    What sort of performance boost do you get from having the OS on a SSD over a fast HD?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by xchaotic View Post
    In most laptops it is possible to fit two drives, usually by replacing the mostly useless DVD drive.

    Looking at prices of current "hybrid" drives it makes more sense to just go with SSD.
    If 120-250GB is not enough for you, then store you porn collection on an external drive perhaps?
    That's what I currently do. And it's not nearly so interesting as porn, it's mostly the results of the folly-infested habit of shooting Medium Format photos and then scanning them at 4000dpi 16-bit.

    I suppose a bit of (self-)organisation and a decent external disk will do the trick. In which case I don't need the upgrade, so the question of what to upgrade to goes away.

    Leave a comment:


  • xchaotic
    replied
    In most laptops it is possible to fit two drives, usually by replacing the mostly useless DVD drive.

    Looking at prices of current "hybrid" drives it makes more sense to just go with SSD.
    If 120-250GB is not enough for you, then store you porn collection on an external drive perhaps?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by yorkshireman View Post
    I agree with xchaotic. Unless there is a really big financial saving from a hybrid drive (or your system can only fit 1 drive) I would go for two separate drives. It will be more upgradeable in the future.
    Seems fair enough but I am indeed looking at a laptop that only takes 1 drive. I am looking at an upgrade from current 160Gb (too small), but 500Gb all-SSD is over the budget. So it's got to be e.g. 500Gb, 1 2.5" disk only, seems like choice is HDD or hybrid. Still don't know which is better out of those choices.

    Leave a comment:


  • yorkshireman
    replied
    I agree with xchaotic. Unless there is a really big financial saving from a hybrid drive (or your system can only fit 1 drive) I would go for two separate drives. It will be more upgradeable in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • xchaotic
    replied
    Easiest thing to do is to buy two separate drives - one SSD, one HDD.
    You will get better performance, better price and better control.

    But also having OS only on the SSD is:
    a) micromanaging
    b) underutilising

    In my current setup I happen to have 160GB SSD, I plan to upgrade with two 120GB sandforce ones in RAID-0.

    For my usage I don't normally exceed 100GB for OS, Apps and data.
    All the content is backed up hourly, which is further backed up daily and then off-site very other week or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    started a topic Hybrid drive MTBF

    Hybrid drive MTBF

    Sorry if this is a dumb question, but would it be possible/a good idea to get a hybrid drive, then partition it so that the OS was on the SSD part and all your data on the HDD part? So a failure in the SSD means a bit of hassle but no lost user data?

    Of course, backing up tends to do that too...

    In fact, wouldn't that be what tended to happen anyway, since user data would be less volatile?

Working...
X