Without understanding the background of your request any further I'd suggest that perhaps the object should be serialisable and stored in the database? That way you have safe / concurrent access to the same object and can wrap a proper transaction around the CRUD actions on it.
If you consider session state in a web farm scenario it's the same. You end up using SQL Server for the most part to handle to the out of proc requirements for sharing access to the session object.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: .NET machine wide object
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ".NET machine wide object"
Collapse
-
.NET machine wide object
I could do with being able to create a single instance of a .NET object which is visible to any .NET process on a machine.
The basic problem being that I have different clients which require exclusive use of a number of resources. I can detect that the resource is in use if a second client is started but this is a bit late, would rather be able to do it at start time.
Any suggestions/examples ?
Obviously it's simple enough to create a mutex or similar which is what I have done in the past, but I would like to associate some data with the object to share between some other processes.
Don't want remoting, but may have to.
Also, stuck at .NET 2.0Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46
- Loan charge recall issue returns, with new demands making UK contractors ‘half-suicidal’ Jun 10 03:58
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Jun 9 06:53
- Closing your limited company isn't failure. It's just the end of a chapter. Jun 8 05:00
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Jun 5 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Jun 4 04:22
- What are Bills of Exchange, and should HMRC's alert worry umbrella contractors? Jun 3 04:09
- Bills of Exchange fail to avoid new umbrella company rules, says HMRC Jun 2 05:32
- Is permanent employment still the safer bet? Yes, but it's a lot less safe than it used to be. Jun 1 04:34

Leave a comment: