I think MS are getting closer to Oracles core market slowly but surely... Ive worked on some fairly major projects with SQL Server 7 and 2000.... Im currently familiarising myself with SQL Server 2005....
Ive found version 2000 to be a very good 'departmental' / medium scale public facing internet database platform... fairly cost effective and well integrated with the other server and development tools.
Ive recently been helping a friend who is learning Java with Eclipse... frankly its noddy compared to Visual Studio 2005 (or even 2003). Its not just the database backend that is considered seperately anymore - its a whole raft of systems / development tools for even a modestly scoped project, and thats where MS has a good set of products.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Oracle V Microsoft
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Oracle V Microsoft"
Collapse
-
If it's a case of a programmer just using a DB as a back-end, then it comes down to his/her experience of MS development, which once you know it's a case of one DB is the same as another.
If it's primarily SQL and PL/SQL as you mentioned then in general for 90%+ of work theres b*gger all difference, with the caveat of course of the way Oracle structures/organises things compared to MS, e.g. Enterprise Manager compared to Oracles equivalent...still we're talking a few days/week here for someone half decent...
If it's a case of add-ons, Oracle Forms/Financials et al, then it's a different ball game.
Joe in "my New Years resolution is to provide helpful advice" mode.
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you Rebecca
The candidate is more programmer than DBA experience in COBOL and PL/SQL
Thanks for your help it’s a tough time getting my head round all the different abbreviations and languages.
Would always appreciate help
Leave a comment:
-
In my view it is a piece of cake as long as the person either already knows how to program using MS type languages e.g. .net, vb etc or can assimilate them pretty quickly, i.e. they are already a programmer and not just a SQL person.
If this is for a DBA position then it is quite different altogether as the DBA tasks, traps and objects are quite different - depends on the platform too, if they're an Oracle DBA specifized in UNIX environments and you move them to a Windows NT-based MS SQL Server environment, it is a reasonable change that requires time to adjust
Leave a comment:
-
Oracle V Microsoft
I need your help, I have a candidate (yes I am a Recruiter but new to IT) who has 15 years experience of developing in oracle. Particularly SQL and PL/SQL. He wants to move over to SQL Server and MS however most clients will not look at assisting in the training required. For those out there those have changed from one to the other please could you tell me how you went about it and how difficult it was?
Thank you in advanceTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: