yep, plenty of places won't let you use open source, simply because if its free, they don't have a company to blame if something happens with it
I also remember Codesmith being proposed at one place, and one of the devs saying "why would i want to use something from a company i've never heard of"
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: .NET Tiers
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ".NET Tiers"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar View PostI think any open source project should offer a paid for option for these stupid companies.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah I had the same hassle with my current gig. When I told them it would save at least a weeks worth of work (on a 9 week project) by using subsonic instead of hand crafting they soon said ok.
Some companies hate open source just because they can’t spend any money on it. I wanted to use bugzilla for tracking issues etc, but the company wanted to buy something instead. I think any open source project should offer a paid for option for these stupid companies.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar View PostSubsonic wraps stored procs nicely. It can also run on top of Enterprise Library
It is also kind of sponsored by Microsoft i.e. they now employ the bloke that kicked it of.
It is also open source, so there are no problems in fixing any problems, or worrying about it being dropped.
although i wonder if an MSFT-only, sproc-only shop will allow open source into their building. you know the sort....
Leave a comment:
-
Subsonic wraps stored procs nicely. It can also run on top of Enterprise Library
It is also kind of sponsored by Microsoft i.e. they now employ the bloke that kicked it of.
It is also open source, so there are no problems in fixing any problems, or worrying about it being dropped.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
ClientCo insists on stored procedures and MS only (and .NET 2.0), in fact some of the standards suggest that all projects should make use of MS Enterprise library. I've been told that we should be able to make use of code generation (from third party templates). Unfortunately, the SP/MS limitations here count out most of your suggestions lambrini.
For the previous project I produced some codesmith templates supporting a variety of features found in NHibernate (lazy loading, persistence ignorance, value objects and a variety of relationships) although these are not polished and I'd like to avoid going back to update these templates if at all possible. I find the whole process of creating templates painfully tedious considering all the manual testing involved.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lambrini_socialist View Postimmature, overly complicated, no persistence ignorance, no implicit lazy-loading, universally loathed by anyone with real O/RM experience....need i go on? version 2 looks like it may be better though.
if you get all your technical advice from microsoft's marketing department, use it. otherwise, use something tried and tested, that's my advice!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by voodooflux View PostI've heard many reports panning the Entity Framework - what's your verdict on it?
if you get all your technical advice from microsoft's marketing department, use it. otherwise, use something tried and tested, that's my advice!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eyetie View PostLINQ is oldskool. Try looking at beta/new projects which build on linq e.q. ADO.NET Entities and Dynamic Data. Having said that, XLINQ is the best XML query tool I've used (far better and more maintainable than XPATH). If you have to use XPATH, grab the Firefox extension which lets you validate XPATH expressions.
I think the OP was after a solution compatible with .NET 2.0 - does the Entity Framework support that?
I've heard many reports panning the Entity Framework - what's your verdict on it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by themistry View PostLook into Linq
TM
Leave a comment:
-
there are loads of options - look at LLBLGen Pro, SubSonic (free) and Codesmith. if you don't like having loads of generated code around, look at NHibernate (my preferred option) and maybe Castle ActiveRecord. but for goodness sake don't hand code ADO.NET for run-of-the-mill apps: this is 2008! data access layers are a solved problem in this day and age, and writing them by hand is a colossal and bug-prone waste of your client's money. just pick an off-the-shelf tool, learn it, then deliver some business value.
Leave a comment:
-
it *does* produce a lot of code and there are those who would say that what it produces is practically bloatware. fine if you need/want it all i guess. there are a lot of other generators/templates out there. for example
http://www.mygenerationsoftware.com/portal/default.aspx
like all of these things, scratch around with the generated code and make sure you understand what it is claiming to do. almost all of them will still require you to open the bonnet and go in and hand code after generation.
Leave a comment:
-
.NET Tiers
I've been having a look at this lately (for .NET 2.0) and it does appear to be quite a time saver. Current ClientCo insists on using stored procedures for all data access but they would like to move towards an nTier architecture for future apps.
Does anyone have any experience using this or have had any problems with it in a production environment? Or has any other recommendations for similar products that support generation of stored procedures for data access?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: