we had a thread about this recently
http://forums.contractoruk.com/techn...negatives.html
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Photo negatives to Digital
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Photo negatives to Digital"
Collapse
-
Well, there is the model V (= LS-50 ED) for 450-500, then the 5000 for twice that. That's the pro model. Same resolution etc.Originally posted by snaw View PostThanks.
Ouch those scan things are expensive!!
Thinking maybe buy one on ebay, use it and re-sell - whatdya reckon?
I wouldn't buy one on ebay, if it's been dropped then it may never focus right: you'll never know for sure but you won't be satisfied with it. It's a real case of "just why is it on ebay?".
Remember it's like a sensitive camera mechanism with extra mechanicals too. That's why it's sensitive: add in the fact that it isn't mass-market, and that explains the cost.
No way round it really. There are cheaper scanners, and some may be OK, but there is more to quality than the numbers. It is like a camera, 2 of them may have the same pixel resolution, but one may be much superior in lens quality and so actual image quality. That's before you bring in the question of dynamic range (DMax) which basically tells you how deep it can see in the dark parts of your photos: that will affect the results too.
You can get flatbed scanners with neg attachments, maybe you could try one out. I have an Epson 4990 or this (to scan Medium Format negs) and although I am not unhappy with i, it is a lesser option: I'd say that with a bit of care it does a decent job of scanning MF up to about the quality equivalent to an 8-10 Mp digital camera. that's not bad but it's not what I use MF for: in 35mm (if that's what you've got) it would be a way to get scanned copies of snaps & pics for the web, but not much more I'd say.
Are you looking to scan a back stock, or just start from about now? Are you looking for quality comparable to what you have in the negative, or just 10*15cm prints, and web stuff? You have to decide, and spend accordingly. Photo stuff has always been thus.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks.Originally posted by expat View PostNikon Coolscan. Be warned it takes time: even at 5 mins real time per exposure that's 3 hours for a 36-exp roll!
I use Peak Imaging (www.peak-imaging.co.uk) for my processing and get them to scan at the same time. Then I do any really good shots on my Coolscan. Since there are not many of those, it doesn't take up a lot of time.
If you are thinking of scanning a big back catalogue of negs, do think carefully if that is how you want to spend your life.
Ouch those scan things are expensive!!
Thinking maybe buy one on ebay, use it and re-sell - whatdya reckon?
Leave a comment:
-
Nikon Coolscan. Be warned it takes time: even at 5 mins real time per exposure that's 3 hours for a 36-exp roll!Originally posted by snaw View PostAnyone recommend either a) A good place to get it done to a good quality, or B) Some good kit to buy to do it?
Missus went down to happy snaps to ask , and they were charging £12 a roll to create 2 megapixles copies!?!? (Best they could do)
I use Peak Imaging (www.peak-imaging.co.uk) for my processing and get them to scan at the same time. Then I do any really good shots on my Coolscan. Since there are not many of those, it doesn't take up a lot of time.
If you are thinking of scanning a big back catalogue of negs, do think carefully if that is how you want to spend your life.
Leave a comment:
-
Photo negatives to Digital
Anyone recommend either a) A good place to get it done to a good quality, or B) Some good kit to buy to do it?
Missus went down to happy snaps to ask , and they were charging £12 a roll to create 2 megapixles copies!?!? (Best they could do)Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Yesterday 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03

Leave a comment: