Originally posted by lilelvis2000
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "clamping .NET framework 3+ .. please HELP!!"
Collapse
-
Thanks - Yes, I had seen this link - however, using mscorcfg how do I know if I'm configuring 2.0 or 3.5???if you fire it up it would only show 2.0 ??
-
but how could that be ? I did read most of the microsoft whitepapers regarding that they don't say that explicitly however they do say that the core of 2.0 is the same for 3.0 - but when it goes to securing the policies they mention that you use the same mscorcfg.msc ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2bc0cxhc.aspx ) - so you assume that you have to seperately configure each version otherwise why mention it at all since 3.5 on deployment would deploy 2.0 & 3.0 anyway???Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post.NET 3.0 and 3.5 is built on 2.0 (it is 2.0 core plus extras). Therefore you are either configuring 2.0 or 1.1 only and by configuring 2.0 you are configuring 3.0 and 3.5 by the same token.
Also what about the new techs that are with 3.0/3.5 like WF WPF etc surely these would have to be clamped as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by argoran View PostHi,
After microsoft ( in their infinite wisdom ) shipped .NET framework 2.0 - for all subsequent releases they stopped shipping them with their own version of the configuration wizard ( mscorcfg.msc ) instead from their documentation you've got to use v2.0's mscorcfg.msc.
my question here is - using that wizard it will always show .NET Framework 2.0 - so how the heck am I supposed to know whether I'm configuring v2.0 or 3.0 or 3.5??
any help would be appreciated....
.NET 3.0 and 3.5 is built on 2.0 (it is 2.0 core plus extras). Therefore you are either configuring 2.0 or 1.1 only and by configuring 2.0 you are configuring 3.0 and 3.5 by the same token.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
clamping .NET framework 3+ .. please HELP!!
Hi,
After microsoft ( in their infinite wisdom ) shipped .NET framework 2.0 - for all subsequent releases they stopped shipping them with their own version of the configuration wizard ( mscorcfg.msc ) instead from their documentation you've got to use v2.0's mscorcfg.msc.
my question here is - using that wizard it will always show .NET Framework 2.0 - so how the heck am I supposed to know whether I'm configuring v2.0 or 3.0 or 3.5??
any help would be appreciated....Last edited by argoran; 1 September 2008, 10:18.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: