Originally posted by lilelvis2000
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "clamping .NET framework 3+ .. please HELP!!"
Collapse
-
Thanks - Yes, I had seen this link - however, using mscorcfg how do I know if I'm configuring 2.0 or 3.5???if you fire it up it would only show 2.0 ??
-
but how could that be ? I did read most of the microsoft whitepapers regarding that they don't say that explicitly however they do say that the core of 2.0 is the same for 3.0 - but when it goes to securing the policies they mention that you use the same mscorcfg.msc ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2bc0cxhc.aspx ) - so you assume that you have to seperately configure each version otherwise why mention it at all since 3.5 on deployment would deploy 2.0 & 3.0 anyway???Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post.NET 3.0 and 3.5 is built on 2.0 (it is 2.0 core plus extras). Therefore you are either configuring 2.0 or 1.1 only and by configuring 2.0 you are configuring 3.0 and 3.5 by the same token.
Also what about the new techs that are with 3.0/3.5 like WF WPF etc surely these would have to be clamped as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by argoran View PostHi,
After microsoft ( in their infinite wisdom ) shipped .NET framework 2.0 - for all subsequent releases they stopped shipping them with their own version of the configuration wizard ( mscorcfg.msc ) instead from their documentation you've got to use v2.0's mscorcfg.msc.
my question here is - using that wizard it will always show .NET Framework 2.0 - so how the heck am I supposed to know whether I'm configuring v2.0 or 3.0 or 3.5??
any help would be appreciated....
.NET 3.0 and 3.5 is built on 2.0 (it is 2.0 core plus extras). Therefore you are either configuring 2.0 or 1.1 only and by configuring 2.0 you are configuring 3.0 and 3.5 by the same token.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
clamping .NET framework 3+ .. please HELP!!
Hi,
After microsoft ( in their infinite wisdom ) shipped .NET framework 2.0 - for all subsequent releases they stopped shipping them with their own version of the configuration wizard ( mscorcfg.msc ) instead from their documentation you've got to use v2.0's mscorcfg.msc.
my question here is - using that wizard it will always show .NET Framework 2.0 - so how the heck am I supposed to know whether I'm configuring v2.0 or 3.0 or 3.5??
any help would be appreciated....Last edited by argoran; 1 September 2008, 10:18.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Leave a comment: