• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Evaluating an Indian provider"

Collapse

  • 51st State
    replied
    Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
    Evaluating the work they are producing, they have already been selected, but that is another matter!

    We need to assess both current work, and tyres hit tarmac.

    Current work - assess things like do they nod, say yes, and deliver tulip, or how do they engage with us, poke and prod and all that.

    Mid-flight - do they run away? Are they training people effectively in the processes, do they update and tweak as required?

    that kinda stuff.....

    Many are soft skills, my challenge is to change gut feel to numbers.
    How are you reviewing their work on a technical level? Code reviews, unit test plan/results reviews etc? If yes, then putting a "score" against this is easy.

    Take a similar approach for Softy Skills. Break down the expected behaviours (as a permie you'll have these as a half-arsed job description or something) into lower levels on a scale of 1-10. 1=carp, 10=proactive comms etc. You could put it into a lovely spreadsheet.

    Then ask the other permies who've had contact to rate them.

    Not really difficult to get to a raw performance number.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    I beg your pardon?

    Are you saying that they have already been approved? So what is the point of doing an evaluation? The criteria they'll be judged against are the ones that should have been applied in the first place. All you've been asked to do is a progress report with or without some 'milestones' thrown in for good measure. I think you said you are a test mgr, this is a PM job, why was it given to you? Or did you 'volunteer'? I pity the company you work for, not a very good choice you've made here. Better get out soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wilmslow
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    Not sure I understand what you are trying to evaluate? Are you evaluating the company itself before giving them the job? Are you evaluating the quality of work they are producing? If it's strategy work surely that can only be evaluated 6 months or more down the line?
    Evaluating the work they are producing, they have already been selected, but that is another matter!

    We need to assess both current work, and tyres hit tarmac.

    Current work - assess things like do they nod, say yes, and deliver tulip, or how do they engage with us, poke and prod and all that.

    Mid-flight - do they run away? Are they training people effectively in the processes, do they update and tweak as required?

    that kinda stuff.....

    Many are soft skills, my challenge is to change gut feel to numbers.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Not sure I understand what you are trying to evaluate? Are you evaluating the company itself before giving them the job? Are you evaluating the quality of work they are producing? If it's strategy work surely that can only be evaluated 6 months or more down the line?

    Leave a comment:


  • Wilmslow
    started a topic Evaluating an Indian provider

    Evaluating an Indian provider

    We have an Indian firm doing the strategy docs. Not my choice, believe me, but they want me to write an evaluation criteria document.

    The problem is that clientco want things that can be measured to crunch numbers with.

    Can anyone point to any evaluation processes that may be of use, or got any thoughts? (Other than run a mile and don’t go permie )
Working...
X