Re: I don't know
My argument exactly, however, when you have an application that have been around for a decade and is used on a number of sites then you have little choice.
Of course, life would be even easier if Microsoft had zero involvement. Smell that coffee.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Microsoft (spit) / Services / RPC / Domain Policies"
Collapse
-
Guest replied
-
Guest repliedI don't know
Microsoft brings the world the perfection that is the .NET framework, with remoting over tcp/ip or http,web services, ability to create and deploy windows services, multithreading and thread pools, code access security, automatic garbage collection, type safe pointers, delegates, enterprise services with just in time activation, com callable wrappers, object pooling, two-phase transaction co-ordinator, xcopy deployment.....
And still people piss about with C, low level Windows API's and other arcane 20th century techniques.
:rolleyes
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedObviously a Grade B question.
Leave a comment:
-
Microsoft (spit) / Services / RPC / Domain Policies
Been a while since I had to dirty my hands inside some Microsoft code and I've forgotten how grubby you can get.
Anyway, I need some pointers and hoped someone on here might be able to help out.
We have a server that is run as a service and our client code (packaged as a lib and dll) uses rpc (ncalrpc driver) as the means of communicating with the server.
Now, here at S........ we are domain users and we don't have any problems installing and running the service and clients in the same domain account.
Unfortunately, we have a customer, also using domain accounts, who can install and run the service but the clients fail to bind to the rpc endpoint.
Have run rpcdump and the endpoint is there on the customer's system. From the code, it looks as though the clients are failing to find the endpoint via the RpcNsBindingImportNext() call.
Is this likely to be a domain setup problem, security issue .....????
Any pointers, good Microsoft (spit) forum etc would be appreciate.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Leave a comment: