• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Best Combo

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Best Combo"

Collapse

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl

    Vetran,

    Thanks a lot. I did find your comments very useful.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl

    > The theoretical throughput is different

    what do you mean?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl

    AtW,

    Thanks for your comments

    0 - 4 KHz is reserved for voice

    20 KHz - 200 KHz up- data

    200KHz- 1.1 Mhz for down- data

    The theoretical throughput is different

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl

    > Lighten up a bit Alexi.

    yeah I will chill out a bit soon thanks. I am prepared to accept that there was a misunderstanding, however my points about ADSL were valid.

    > Also I didnt notice him say that this was a consumer
    > package.

    Indeed but he claims ridiculous figures for upload being higher than download - as I said design spec specifically optimised ADSL (and 56k) for downloading rather than uploading.

    I am personally on Telewest Cable (1Mbit) and I am gutted that they wont offer business tariff for 1-2Mbits upstream - I'd like to host a few things in the house.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl

    Most ISP's tend to run

    'FAMP'

    FreeBSD Apache MySQL and PHP

    Highly recommend it, very stable, nice and fast lots of support.

    As to 200 webs, no don't do it. ADSL is 256 upload split between 50 users so it could conceivably be slower than a modem. Many ADSL suppliers limit data transfer, the infrastructure also assumes 50:1 or greater contention ratio .

    Get it hosted on an ISP's server, you can hire your own server for very little a month or alternatively sign up as a reseller on a shared server for nothing or very little (depends if you want to pay per site or sign up for a block). If you are interested I can recommend an ISP who can do you a deal, they have fast links and give great support - send me a private with a bit more detail (bandwidth required etc).

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    adsl

    AtW

    I suspect that McBain means that if he hosts the web sites at his location then the access for his customers will be as he states. Because they are accessing him the usual speeds are reversed. His customers will get the higher speed to upload from the web to his servers, and the lower speed to download.


    Also I didnt notice him say that this was a consumer package.

    Lighten up a bit Alexi.

    McBain, what are these host going to be doing ? have you looked in colocation or server rental ?

    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl ?

    McBainCo: oh yea, really? Where is it such a wonderful ADSL tha thas upload higher than download? Are you aware that one of the fundamental design decisions was to increase download at the expense of upload because in typical browsing people download more than upload? This is precisely the reason why ADSL is not well suited for servers that mainly UPLOAD rather than download.

    There is nowhere in the UK an ADSL on offer with your spec (show links if you have any). The best consumer grade will give you 1Mb down and 128-256kbit up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl ?

    AtW

    Download up to 512k, upload is up to 1.5M.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl ?

    If you mean ADSL for hosting sites at home then you need to consider that its Assymetric - download bandwidth is 512kbit but upload is 128kbit - thats not much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: adsl ?

    Mark Snowdon,

    Thanks a lot for your advice and feedback.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    adsl ?

    McBain,

    as ever 'it depends' , but I doubt it. If the 200 sites are just going to be individual homepages with no heavy content then you might get away with it, but if they are going to actually do anything then I doubt it.

    All you need is for a couple of people to have largish downloads on there and your bandwidth goes. If you are going to have 200 shops with quality graphics, lots of activity then 512 doesnt last long.

    What sort of sites - are you getting the emails down the same pipe, what contention will you get from your isp, etc. Oh and dont forget backup in event of connection problems.

    I would open a new topic - I would think that most people stopped reading this one after the initial response

    Mark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Will an ADSL connection be sufficient?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    ah that - I thought it was acceptable to use negative in that phrase - "you dont know nothing" kind of thing - double negative is not view as minue minus making plus, but just stressing the point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    "he does what?"

    know Jack sh1t.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    LAMP seems to be the answer

    Linux, Apache, MySQL, PhP.

    Can anyone advise on the the physical and logical architecture to run a small hosting site ( 200 domains) offering also e-mail?

    With regards to comms, what is the best solution? Will ADSL suffice?

    Thanks for the advice.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X