• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Naff rejections

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Naff rejections"

Collapse

  • BrowneIssue
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
    Why is this in LR?

    Admin, did you put it here? It seems a relevant and proper post for General to me.
    I did it 'cos I'm a newbie and far too shy to create a thread there.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Why is this in LR?

    Admin, did you put it here? It seems a relevant and proper post for General to me.

    Apart from my inane contribution of course...

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by mailric View Post
    the only thing better is the way my last post changed the word i'd used to "noddy" - quality.

    who can guess the actuall word????
    PC Plod

    Leave a comment:


  • mailric
    replied
    the only thing better is the way my last post changed the word i'd used to "noddy" - quality.

    who can guess the actuall word????

    Leave a comment:


  • mailric
    replied
    ha ha. the client must know c0ck all about project management.

    i've heard the term 'born project managers' used before but thats taking it a little too literally.

    brilliant.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    "Sorry, but you previously did business analysis. They want a pure PM. Since you did something else beforehand, you are not suitable."
    well you wouldn't want to show them up by having some practical knowledge would you?

    Back in my more junior days I was going for a contract for a certain British petroleum company as an XP (agile) developer. I had at that time about 3 years of agile experience and 3 years of more traditional projects. They thought the 3 years of non-agile was a problem. Blatently, they wanted not just somebody who knew about agile, but somebody who didn't know any better, and would shut up while they did their 2-year 12-man big bang project in a completely stupid way. (which I would have, in fact...)

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    I think the naffest rejection I ever had was when a woman I'd just asked out called me a lame duck...

    I ask you, do I look like a fliping duck?
    just a polite way of telling you you're quackers







    Leave a comment:


  • Bear
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    I think the naffest rejection I ever had was when a woman I'd just asked out called me a lame duck...

    I ask you, do I look like a fliping duck?
    For a start - You haven't got a limp.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
    A new rejection reason (and have I had plenty!) for a project manager role:

    "Sorry, but you previously did business analysis. They want a pure PM. Since you did something else beforehand, you are not suitable."

    According to the agent, in subsequent questioning, the client definitely will only consider people that have only ever done project management and nothing else.

    (Other than the default assumption that the agency is lying...) explanations on a postcard?
    Don't think there can be any explanation - it's a blatant lie. Unless they are after really bad project managers, who have no experience - which is a possibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrowneIssue
    started a topic Naff rejections

    Naff rejections

    A new rejection reason (and have I had plenty!) for a project manager role:

    "Sorry, but you previously did business analysis. They want a pure PM. Since you did something else beforehand, you are not suitable."

    According to the agent, in subsequent questioning, the client definitely will only consider people that have only ever done project management and nothing else.

    (Other than the default assumption that the agency is lying...) explanations on a postcard?

Working...
X