Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Guest started a topic Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

27 October 2003, 12:21
Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

<FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>The trolling seems to have gone right down hill on CUK lately, and I wonder if we used to have a better class of Troll a few years back?</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>Results (total votes = 9):</FONT><table bgcolor=#FFFFFF border=0 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0 width="75%">
<tbody>
<tr><td bgcolor="#000000" colspan=3 height=1></tr><TR BGCOLOR=#E0E0E0><TD NOWRAP>
<FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>Yes</FONT>&nbsp</td>
<td height><FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>6 / 66.7%</FONT>&nbsp</td><td><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/bar.gif width=200 height=10 hspace=3> </td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#000000" colspan=3 height=1></tr><TR BGCOLOR=#E0E0E0><TD NOWRAP>
<FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>No</FONT>&nbsp</td>
<td height><FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>1 / 11.1%</FONT>&nbsp</td><td><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/bar.gif width=33 height=10 hspace=3> </td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#000000" colspan=3 height=1></tr><TR BGCOLOR=#E0E0E0><TD NOWRAP>
<FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>Pardon? Speak up you young whippersnapper!</FONT>&nbsp</td>
<td height><FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>2 / 22.2%</FONT>&nbsp</td><td><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/bar.gif width=66 height=10 hspace=3> </td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#000000" colspan=3 height=1></tr></tbody>
</table>
<a href=http://p201.ezboard.com/fcukfrm5.showMessage?topicID=454.topic><FONT FACE="Verdana,Arial" SIZE=2>Vote Now</FONT></a> &nbsp
Tags: None

Reply to: Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

Previously on "Did we used to have a better class of Troll?"

Partners

Advertisers

Contractor Services

CUK News

Reply to: Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

Previously on "Did we used to have a better class of Troll?"

Did we used to have a better class of Troll?

Partners

Advertisers

Contractor Services

CUK News

Tag Cloud