- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IR35 offset consultation
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 offset consultation"
Collapse
-
No, I don't think it will factor into any risk calculations. It's basically to counter the legitimate complaint that the overall tax paid could be more than owed, but also that the contractor could, in principle, end up receiving a refund of the overpaid tax (as reported in the FT in relation to the public sector). This would instead offset the overpaid tax against the FP's tax bill.
-
IR35 offset consultation
https://www.contractoruk.com/news/00..._taxation.html
Would dealing with the offset issue result in clients moving away from blanket determinations or blanket bans?
I am inclined to think this will make no difference to client decisions for the simple reason that the client has no way of knowing how much tax the contractor's LtdCo paid on the assignment income. The client is therefore is unable to quantify the offset and therefore the financial risk.
e.g. £100k contract value, LtdCo overall tax paid (roughly) could be between £4k and 40k.
So while this may be 'fair' I'm not sure that it's going to make a difference to clients' evaluation of the risk of offering 'outside' roles.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How HMRC’s umbrella company JSL rules will play out Yesterday 23:33
- As Small Business Commissioner, I invite unpaid limited company contractors to come forward Yesterday 17:50
- Is Labour just going to leave limited company contracting zombie-like, neither dead nor alive? Aug 12 22:56
- Contracting Awards 2025 unveils ‘stellar’ shortlist Aug 11 21:31
- If it’s JSL liability, it’s Managed Service Providers (MSPs) too, potentially Aug 8 02:54
- Labour's new anti-late payment package ‘a contractor confidence boost’ Aug 7 00:33
- MSC test cases: Feb 2026 spells certainty for Boox/CK contractors Aug 6 05:36
- Under JSL, agencies are ‘umbrella companies’ if no brollies are present Aug 4 23:06
- How to get paid by a closed (or closing) recruitment agency Aug 4 17:37
- How four HMRC consultations from Spring Statement 2025 are shaping up for contractors Jul 31 14:39
Leave a comment: