• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "£ 770 a day in Worthing anyone?"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    Comes under the typical government meddling where they want to be seen to do the right thing (everyone paying their 'fair share' of tax) but go about solving it in totally the wrong way.

    If they'd gone the other way and made PS contracts 100% tax free and direct B2B with the contractor (so no need for agencies or payroll companies wanting their cut), they could have reduced the rates and overall outlay from the taxpayer, and attracted better candidates away from the private sector that may have had a chance of sorting out their multitude of expensive IT projects before they failed.
    Due to minister, senior civil servant, intra-department and external department politicking and meddling that would never happen.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Comes under the typical government meddling where they want to be seen to do the right thing (everyone paying their 'fair share' of tax) but go about solving it in totally the wrong way.

    If they'd gone the other way and made PS contracts 100% tax free and direct B2B with the contractor (so no need for agencies or payroll companies wanting their cut), they could have reduced the rates and overall outlay from the taxpayer, and attracted better candidates away from the private sector that may have had a chance of sorting out their multitude of expensive IT projects before they failed.

    Leave a comment:


  • SeanT
    replied
    Love the write the theme tune, sing the theme tune bucket list for a front end dev as usual, probably justifies that rate if they can find such a Unicorn...

    System administration and configuration management skills.
    Experience of building and scaling high-traffic websites.
    Although:

    including use of terminal.

    Leave a comment:


  • oliverson
    started a topic £ 770 a day in Worthing anyone?

    £ 770 a day in Worthing anyone?

    Doesn't this just make a mockery of Public Sector IR35?

    https://www.jobserve.com/FI52t

    A rate that is probably double what it should be and we, the tax payers (sometimes), are footing the bill. Aside from that, what is the impact on the private sector? Can't see them stumping up rates like that or even close.

Working...
X