Originally posted by northernladyuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Outside to Inside IR35 - Same Client, Different Agent, Different Contract"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostLooking at the information that HMRC would have from a pure data point of view:
- Currently, they know your NI number, the agency reporting the information, the amount paid. They do not know the client, the job, the title, how you work etc.
- You move from agency to an umbrella company - you disappear from the agency reporting requirements because the umbrella now deducts PAYE and NI for you. You appear on umbrella RTI as an employee. HMRC are unaware of the client, the job, the title, etc
- You close the current company down - HMRC are aware that the company is closed and any money you get from that closure, via your self assessment next year
- In the future, you create a new company, take a contract on via an agency outside IR35. You appear again on the agency reporting requirements with your NI number and amount. HMRC don't know anything about what you are doing (unless the reporting requirements change in the future)
Is it possible for someone / something to tie all those things together and trigger an investigation into the way you worked before you moved to the umbrella company? Yes. But I would consider the likelihood of something like that happening when there are plenty of other cases that will be much easier for HMRC to investigate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostLooking at the information that HMRC would have from a pure data point of view:
- Currently, they know your NI number, the agency reporting the information, the amount paid. They do not know the client, the job, the title, how you work etc.
- You move from agency to an umbrella company - you disappear from the agency reporting requirements because the umbrella now deducts PAYE and NI for you. You appear on umbrella RTI as an employee. HMRC are unaware of the client, the job, the title, etc
- You close the current company down - HMRC are aware that the company is closed and any money you get from that closure, via your self assessment next year
- In the future, you create a new company, take a contract on via an agency outside IR35. You appear again on the agency reporting requirements with your NI number and amount. HMRC don't know anything about what you are doing (unless the reporting requirements change in the future)
Is it possible for someone / something to tie all those things together and trigger an investigation into the way you worked before you moved to the umbrella company? Yes. But I would consider the likelihood of something like that happening when there are plenty of other cases that will be much easier for HMRC to investigate.
Thanks to everyone for the great feedback - useful stuff!
With regard to this scenario - do you gain a lot by actually closing the company down? Would it be much different to keeping the company going and then invoicing through it again on a future contract?
Would HMRC not have similar issues trying to piece it together in the same way (i.e. tying your stint with the brolly to the previous limited contract) as it all seems to be NI based anyway?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Lane View PostMoss,
It all depends on your view on risk - changing the agency would help, but is it still the same contract - maybe compare old and new 'LOT' numbers on the contract Description?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhy are so many people accepting inside contracts????
I never tried pushing back on the decision, but I've been aware of the difficulties they've had in (a) understanding and (b) adapting to the these new rules over the last few months, and don't believe they would change now they've come to their decision.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostThanks. I had assumed that MVL / ER/ capital gains relief would not be an option but was asking with regard to IR35 investigation risk, with the Ltd closed down, operating via a brolly with same client. A level of risk I would be comfortable with I think.
- Currently, they know your NI number, the agency reporting the information, the amount paid. They do not know the client, the job, the title, how you work etc.
- You move from agency to an umbrella company - you disappear from the agency reporting requirements because the umbrella now deducts PAYE and NI for you. You appear on umbrella RTI as an employee. HMRC are unaware of the client, the job, the title, etc
- You close the current company down - HMRC are aware that the company is closed and any money you get from that closure, via your self assessment next year
- In the future, you create a new company, take a contract on via an agency outside IR35. You appear again on the agency reporting requirements with your NI number and amount. HMRC don't know anything about what you are doing (unless the reporting requirements change in the future)
Is it possible for someone / something to tie all those things together and trigger an investigation into the way you worked before you moved to the umbrella company? Yes. But I would consider the likelihood of something like that happening when there are plenty of other cases that will be much easier for HMRC to investigate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe problem with closing down the company is that pesky word "trade" in the legislation around tax avoidance by closing the company down - you are still in the same trade even though you are working as an employee. The employer being a brolly company makes this slightly more awkward as well since it might be harder to defend if HMRC ask questions.
You can always close the company, it's whether you can close it and retain any of the tax advantages of an MVL / ER/ capital gains relief. If you have enough retained capital then there are other ways that might be appealing to get access to that money without closing the business.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe problem with closing down the company is that pesky word "trade" in the legislation around tax avoidance by closing the company down - you are still in the same trade even though you are working as an employee. The employer being a brolly company makes this slightly more awkward as well since it might be harder to defend if HMRC ask questions.
You can always close the company, it's whether you can close it and retain any of the tax advantages of an MVL / ER/ capital gains relief. If you have enough retained capital then there are other ways that might be appealing to get access to that money without closing the business.
You have then cut the link between yourself and you old PS outside contract, decreasing your risk.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostAnd from a risk point of view, if I had a contract and working practices reviewed by QDOS or AN Other and assessed as outside IR35, and I could get paid before 6 April, I would be comfortable closing the Ltd down and operating going forward via a brolly. Thoughts?
You can always close the company, it's whether you can close it and retain any of the tax advantages of an MVL / ER/ capital gains relief. If you have enough retained capital then there are other ways that might be appealing to get access to that money without closing the business.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhy are so many people accepting inside contracts????
At my NHS client, nearly every contractor (working with I.T) was willing to accept an inside contract until they considered the risk of retrospective taxation.
Of course once that was considered the opposite became true and now everyone is finishing up on Friday, with agency payments agreed for next Wednesday.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostBut you aren't just looking for that - you are looking for them to make a potentially fraudulent declaration in the hope that it protects you from an investigation into all work you have done under this contract.
The reason they are saying the role is now inside is because other contractors are working the usual 9 to 5 grind in a supervised environment and as such the client is taking a broad brush approach.
For the above reasons I'm fighting that my role is outside.Last edited by Scotchpie; 29 March 2017, 09:44.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostA I said in in the FAQ:
As others have posted, if there is a break between contracts (particularly where the agency changes) then looking at the data that HMRC have available to them the chance of an investigation straight away into your previous working practices could be lower. However, that doesn't mean that HMRC won't come knocking to ask about the working practices, and you'll need to have a good defence if they do.
As you say - it's down to how easily you want to sleep at night, so good luck with whatever decision you make.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scotchpie View PostMy strategy is to persuade them that I am only looking for outside status for this one week and then the contract ends.
If I was the client I'd be incredibly wary of making that declaration and would be looking at what potential liability that might open up for the PSB in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Moss View PostSo I was just thinking I was maybe being too cautious trying to retro-fit my old contract accounts into being inside IR35 - and in this case I can just accept the old contract as being outside, and the new contract as being inside IR35 and carry on.
Appreciate no-one really knows how HMRC will deal with these situations - and it all comes down to ‘how well you want to sleep at night’, but I’m thinking this gives me a *fair* degree of confidence that the old contract is well enough covered to cause HMRC to pass over if it ever arose (and yes, I have IR35 insurance).
Thought it might be useful to throw this particular scenario into the mix and see if anyone had any (hopefully constructive) insights?…
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostLooking at the data that is provided by an agency to HMRC, they do not provide the job title, client, job role or any meaningful details about the work that your company is providing to the client. There have been a number of discussions here around whether HMRC will have a data set that clearly identifies who (and what) to ask - I will not speculate on whether this is likely or not. However, I would carefully consider what implications might be drawn by an agency continuing to pay the same contractor under different terms from one pay period to the next. It might be a different matter if the contractor changed agency, but I would be wary about continuing under these circumstances.
As you say - it's down to how easily you want to sleep at night, so good luck with whatever decision you make.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostCarrying on via your Ltd? Sounds risky.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: