This idea ran out of steam due to general lack of interest.
We instead pursued evidence gathering in our own client population and have a good body of material.
The recent letters from FS Capital and Felicitas have sparked renewed interest but I think that unless you have the smoking gun, we have what we need from our clients.
The plan to create an alternative platform to prevent loans falling into potentially unfriendly hands has been overtaken by events. That is no longer an active theme in our business and unless there is any enthusiasm rekindled for it, probably will not be renewed.
What is the smoking gun?
Written evidence from the "lender" that money paid to you - described as a loan - is regarded by them as something else, i.e. not a loan. Further, a statement in writing that the alleged lender will not request repayment of the claimed loan.
Note. Often the FAQ that came with introductory packs or marketing material made statements along the lines above. That is NOT what I need. That is a statement made prior to you signing a legal contract and I am advised may have little weight legally. We can and will make use of such statements, but really it's a post payment written statement that I need please.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Trusts, trustees, proposed actions, call for information"
Collapse
-
I am happy to share - what do you need I have all email correspondences, illustrations agreements etc
Leave a comment:
-
I am happy to participate,, please get in touch.Originally posted by webberg View PostWe are seeing more and more trusts, trustees and their advisers suggesting to beneficiaries and lenders (not always the same people) that they are about to take certain actions vis a vis the loans that remain outstanding.
It is no coincidence that this comes at a time when the settlement deadline is approaching at the speed of time and more and more ex-promoters and related parties are becoming more difficult to find and deal with.
It also has to be said that some (not all) are seeing an opportunity to make some more fees, sometimes by suggesting that loans will be recalled unless certain payments are made. For all we know this is a legitimate position for them to take.
That said, we are gathering our resources and mobilising our legal people to examine and if necessary (and possible) we will challenge certain actions.
We are also considering a structure that may offer trusts/trustees an alternative if their objective is simply to remove a layer of cost from their bottom line.
We have a library of material on most schemes and have asked our clients for more.
We are though looking for additional material on some arrangements.
If you are willing and able to volunteer that material and waive whatever GDPR issues necessary, we would be grateful to receive documentary evidence.
You do not have to be a client. There will be no fee. You will not be included on a marketing database and be pestered with "join us" messages.
Our initial projects are loans/assets held or organised by:
Pinotage Trustees
RJW
Fleming Laing
Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you.
Ask the mods for PM rights - drop me a PM - I'll send back my email.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by webberg View PostWe are seeing more and more trusts, trustees and their advisers suggesting to beneficiaries and lenders (not always the same people) that they are about to take certain actions vis a vis the loans that remain outstanding.
It is no coincidence that this comes at a time when the settlement deadline is approaching at the speed of time and more and more ex-promoters and related parties are becoming more difficult to find and deal with.
It also has to be said that some (not all) are seeing an opportunity to make some more fees, sometimes by suggesting that loans will be recalled unless certain payments are made. For all we know this is a legitimate position for them to take.
That said, we are gathering our resources and mobilising our legal people to examine and if necessary (and possible) we will challenge certain actions.
We are also considering a structure that may offer trusts/trustees an alternative if their objective is simply to remove a layer of cost from their bottom line.
We have a library of material on most schemes and have asked our clients for more.
We are though looking for additional material on some arrangements.
If you are willing and able to volunteer that material and waive whatever GDPR issues necessary, we would be grateful to receive documentary evidence.
You do not have to be a client. There will be no fee. You will not be included on a marketing database and be pestered with "join us" messages.
Our initial projects are loans/assets held or organised by:
Pinotage Trustees
RJW
Fleming Laing
Thank you.
Ok, please let me know what you need, happy to participate
Leave a comment:
-
Trusts, trustees, proposed actions, call for information
We are seeing more and more trusts, trustees and their advisers suggesting to beneficiaries and lenders (not always the same people) that they are about to take certain actions vis a vis the loans that remain outstanding.
It is no coincidence that this comes at a time when the settlement deadline is approaching at the speed of time and more and more ex-promoters and related parties are becoming more difficult to find and deal with.
It also has to be said that some (not all) are seeing an opportunity to make some more fees, sometimes by suggesting that loans will be recalled unless certain payments are made. For all we know this is a legitimate position for them to take.
That said, we are gathering our resources and mobilising our legal people to examine and if necessary (and possible) we will challenge certain actions.
We are also considering a structure that may offer trusts/trustees an alternative if their objective is simply to remove a layer of cost from their bottom line.
We have a library of material on most schemes and have asked our clients for more.
We are though looking for additional material on some arrangements.
If you are willing and able to volunteer that material and waive whatever GDPR issues necessary, we would be grateful to receive documentary evidence.
You do not have to be a client. There will be no fee. You will not be included on a marketing database and be pestered with "join us" messages.
Our initial projects are loans/assets held or organised by:
Pinotage Trustees
RJW
Fleming Laing
Thank you.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: