- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Legitimate Expenses
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Legitimate Expenses"
Collapse
-
Hence the "stupid question" part. But was wondering whether any conversations with HMRC have touched on this point?
-
Dont be silly. Retrospection only works in HMRC's favour, not ours.Originally posted by burnside View PostApologies if this has been covered before and almost certainly a stupid question, but given that the scheme enquires, DR charge, etc. are to ensure that we pay what HMRC see as the 'correct' amount of tax, shouldn't we be able to offset legitimate expenses against any tax charges/settlement, be it CLSO2 or DR19?
Had we paid the correct amount of tax at the correct time we would have been able to offset these expenses; such as travel, accommodation, training courses, etc. so shouldn't we be able to do so against the retrospective tax on the loans as they are being classes as remuneration? Surely only then can we be paying the correct amount of tax?
Leave a comment:
-
Legitimate Expenses
Apologies if this has been covered before and almost certainly a stupid question, but given that the scheme enquires, DR charge, etc. are to ensure that we pay what HMRC see as the 'correct' amount of tax, shouldn't we be able to offset legitimate expenses against any tax charges/settlement, be it CLSO2 or DR19?
Had we paid the correct amount of tax at the correct time we would have been able to offset these expenses; such as travel, accommodation, training courses, etc. so shouldn't we be able to do so against the retrospective tax on the loans as they are being classes as remuneration? Surely only then can we be paying the correct amount of tax?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Today 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Yesterday 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40

Leave a comment: