• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Public Accounts Commitee"

Collapse

  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    When you compare our committee hearings with the American ones that the senate runs, it's amazing the difference between the two.

    Probably because senators tend to have been lawyers before becoming politicians so know how to grill people properly, whereas we have a collection of MPs who are career politicians from the day they left school to where they are now.
    Yes, exactly. There are some notable exceptions, such as Stephen Phillips QC, who is excellent (and on the PAC, incidentally).

    Leave a comment:


  • webberg
    replied
    Anybody who thinks that the PAC is anything more than a kangaroo Court filled with second rate politicians looking to make headlines at their victims expense, is deluded.

    Leave a comment:


  • DotasScandal
    replied
    Originally posted by Not Losing Any Sleep View Post
    As with Hodge, its all about a bunch of second tier politicians who are out of their depth trying to score points and make headlines and look good on TV.
    Aptly summarized.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Caroline Flint keeps asking questions and then just talks over the poor bloke when he reaches a part of the explanation that she doesn't understand i.e. after about 20 seconds

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by Not Losing Any Sleep View Post
    As with Hodge, its all about a bunch of second tier politicians who are out of their depth trying to score points and make headlines and look good on TV. I thought HMRC did OK. Homer looked less convincing on the area of the time it takes to close small business investigations.
    Agreed - I don't know where they get off with all this - it wouldn't be so bad if they had even the vaguest clue on what they're talking about - they don't even seem to get that tax is payable on profit and not revenue

    Leave a comment:


  • Not Losing Any Sleep
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    The chairwoman really is particularly aggressive It doesn't seem right that she's grilling the bloke over his personal salary - think I'd tell her to mind her own damn business
    As with Hodge, its all about a bunch of second tier politicians who are out of their depth trying to score points and make headlines and look good on TV. I thought HMRC did OK. Homer looked less convincing on the area of the time it takes to close small business investigations.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    The chairwoman really is particularly aggressive It doesn't seem right that she's grilling the bloke over his personal salary - think I'd tell her to mind her own damn business

    Leave a comment:


  • Not Losing Any Sleep
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    When you compare our committee hearings with the American ones that the senate runs, it's amazing the difference between the two.

    Probably because senators tend to have been lawyers before becoming politicians so know how to grill people properly, whereas we have a collection of MPs who are career politicians from the day they left school to where they are now.
    MP Deidre Brock is having a go at grilling HMRC. Her background as a Home and Away actress looks to be helping!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    When you compare our committee hearings with the American ones that the senate runs, it's amazing the difference between the two.

    Probably because senators tend to have been lawyers before becoming politicians so know how to grill people properly, whereas we have a collection of MPs who are career politicians from the day they left school to where they are now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not Losing Any Sleep
    replied
    Originally posted by Not Losing Any Sleep View Post
    Just listening to the Public Accounts Committee try and grill the Google Tax boys on their affairs. The PAC team are truly dreadful. Meg Hillier - what a disaster. About as effective as a chocolate teapot.
    Now the turn of the HMRC team. Will see if they are any better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not Losing Any Sleep
    started a topic Public Accounts Commitee

    Public Accounts Commitee

    Just listening to the Public Accounts Committee try and grill the Google Tax boys on their affairs. The PAC team are truly dreadful. Meg Hillier - what a disaster. About as effective as a chocolate teapot.

Working...
X