• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Montpelier APN withdrawl hits mainstream press"

Collapse

  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    Wow, that's amazing. The IRS used to act like that for ages until a major overhaul in the 90s to make them "friendlier" and a recognition that forcing people to liquidate assets to settle a bill prior to the actual investigation, probably wasn't a very nice thing to do.

    I think part of the problem is down to the remit of these organisations. Given the unwillingness to raise taxes, the main means of paying the bills for the current government is cutting social spending and ensuring all taxes owed are collected - necessarily you're going to see a much more agressive attitude from HMRC because there's apparently a half-billion to be made going after "tax dodgers."
    Especially when you keep changing the definition of 'tax dodger'

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Wow, that's amazing. The IRS used to act like that for ages until a major overhaul in the 90s to make them "friendlier" and a recognition that forcing people to liquidate assets to settle a bill prior to the actual investigation, probably wasn't a very nice thing to do.

    I think part of the problem is down to the remit of these organisations. Given the unwillingness to raise taxes, the main means of paying the bills for the current government is cutting social spending and ensuring all taxes owed are collected - necessarily you're going to see a much more agressive attitude from HMRC because there's apparently a half-billion to be made going after "tax dodgers."
    Last edited by seanraaron; 19 January 2016, 11:32.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    None of his firm’s clients have yet been reimbursed by the tax authority, which in its letter wrote, “sorry for the inconvenience caused”.

    When we make a mistake, we are criminals who need our bank account raided. When they make a deliberate systematic bullying action, nothing happens. I am amazed they apologized.

    Leave a comment:


  • anothercontractor1
    replied
    Link via Google results (otherwise you hit a paywall): https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourc...s+APN+withdraw

    Leave a comment:


  • Montpelier APN withdrawl hits mainstream press

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1ebe52d8-b...#axzz3xfxr42tu

Working...
X